Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;106(10):e70224.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.70224.

Habitat fidelity in hawksbill sea turtles

Andrew S Maurer  1   2   3 , Julia A Horrocks  4 , Claudio Bellini  5 , Karen L Eckert  6 , Alexandra L Fireman  3   7   8 , Mariana M P B Fuentes  9 , Barry Krueger  10 , Kathryn E Levasseur  3   11 , Maria A Marcovaldi  12 , Renata M A Ramos  13 , Seth P Stapleton  3   14 , Hannah B Vander Zanden  7 , Lotus Vermeer  4   15 , Daniel H G Viera  16 , Erik A P Dos Santos  5 , Armando J B Santos  9   16
Affiliations

Habitat fidelity in hawksbill sea turtles

Andrew S Maurer et al. Ecology. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Climate change is altering habitat suitability and driving shifts in species distributions. To understand potential responses by mobile animals, it is essential to assess levels of plasticity in habitat use, ranging from transience to long-term fidelity. Here, we evaluate the fidelity of hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) to habitats used while foraging (our primary focus), migrating, and nesting. After satellite tracking 17 adult females from three Western Atlantic nesting areas, we then re-tracked them in a subsequent year. Of 15 turtles with sufficient data to assess interannual foraging area fidelity, 14 returned to the same home range, exhibiting overlap between successive 50% utilization distributions (UDs); the 15th individual shifted <10 km. Mean precision of fidelity, here expressed as the distance between centroids of successive foraging UDs, was 1.45 ± SD 2.3 km-less than the error associated with many satellite fixes. We also observed fidelity to inter-nesting home ranges and migratory pathways, though distinct deviations in migratory routes occurred. A paradigm of precise habitat fidelity is likely appropriate for adult hawksbills, yet merits further investigation across life history stages and global populations. Our results suggest that adult transience may have limited potential to contribute to projected distributional shifts.

Keywords: Argos; Eretmochelys imbricata; Fastloc GPS; foraging area; inter‐nesting; migration; post‐nesting; satellite telemetry; satellite track; species distribution.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bradshaw, C. J. A., M. A. Hindell, M. D. Sumner, and K. J. Michael. 2004. “Loyalty Pays: Potential Life History Consequences of Fidelity to Marine Foraging Regions by Southern Elephant Seals.” Animal Behaviour 68: 1349–1360.
    1. Calabrese, J. M., C. H. Fleming, and E. Gurarie. 2016. “ctmm: An R Package for Analyzing Animal Relocation Data as a Continuous‐Time Stochastic Process.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 1124–1132.
    1. Calenge, C., and S. Fortmann‐Roe. 2023. “adehabitatHR: Home Range Estimation.” R Package Version 0.4.21.
    1. Carr, A. 1975. “The Ascension Island Green Turtle Colony.” Copeia 1975: 547–555.
    1. Dujon, A. M., R. T. Lindstrom, and G. C. Hays. 2014. “The Accuracy of Fastloc‐GPS Locations and Implications for Animal Tracking.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5: 1162–1169.

Grants and funding