Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 8:e254054.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4054. Online ahead of print.

Minimally Invasive vs Open Left Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Randomized DIPLOMA Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

Minimally Invasive vs Open Left Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Randomized DIPLOMA Trial

Caro L Bruna et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: The DIPLOMA trial showed comparable radical resection rates after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP) and open left pancreatectomy (OLP) in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer. Data on long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) are currently lacking, but are required before the oncological efficacy of MILP can be confirmed.

Objective: To determine the long-term oncological outcome, including OS and DFS, of MILP vs OLP in patients with upfront resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer in the DIPLOMA trial.

Design, setting, and participants: The randomized, patient-blinded and pathologist-blinded DIPLOMA trial was conducted between 2018 and 2021, with a follow-up duration of at least 36 months. It was a multicenter international trial that took place in 35 centers in 12 countries worldwide. Patients with upfront resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas were included.

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to undergo MILP (laparoscopic and robotic) or OLP. Patients were blinded for the surgical approach.

Main outcomes and measures: Main outcomes included OS and DFS. Other outcomes include receipt of adjuvant therapy and time to start of adjuvant therapy.

Results: Between May 2018 and May 2021, 258 patients were randomized to the MILP (131 patients) and OLP (127 patients) groups. After a median follow-up of 38 (IQR 36-46) months, 134 patients (52%) had died and 127 patients (55%) experienced disease recurrence. OS did not differ significantly between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 32 vs 34 months; stratified hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.72-1.44; P = .92). Also, DFS did not significantly differ between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 21 vs 17 months; stratified hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.68-1.35; P = .81). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 79 patients after MILP (79 of 113 [70%]) and 79 patients after OLP (79 of 110 [72%]) (P = .63). Time to adjuvant therapy was comparable between groups (median 59 vs 56 days; P = .92).

Conclusions and relevance: In this long-term follow-up of the randomized DIPLOMA trial in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer, oncological outcomes after MILP and OLP did not differ significantly, confirming the oncological safety of MILP.

Trial registration: International Standard Registered Clinical/Social Study Number Registry Identifier: ISRCTN44897265.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bruna reported grants from Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson during the conduct of the study and grants from the Intuitive Foundation and the Dutch Cancer Foundation outside the submitted work. Dr Lips reported personal fees from Intuitive Proctorship outside the submitted work. Dr Luyer reported grants from Medtronic and Galvani outside the submitted work. Dr Besselink reported grants from Medtronic during the conduct of the study and grants from Intuitive Surgical outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment in

  • doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4068

References

    1. Rahib L, Wehner MR, Matrisian LM, Nead KT. Estimated projection of US cancer incidence and death to 2040. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e214708-e214708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4708 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Björnsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T, Sandström P. Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2020;107(10):1281-1288. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11554 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. ; ALaCaRT Investigators . Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356-1363. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources