Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;44(23-24):e70275.
doi: 10.1002/sim.70275.

Adaptive Biomarker-Based Design for Early Phase Clinical Trials

Affiliations

Adaptive Biomarker-Based Design for Early Phase Clinical Trials

Alessandra Serra et al. Stat Med. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Identifying and quantifying predictive biomarkers is a critical issue of Precision Medicine approaches and patient-centric clinical development strategies. Early phase adaptive designs can improve trial efficiency by allowing for adaptations during the course of the trial. In this work, we are interested in adaptations based on interim analysis permitting a refinement of the existing study population according to their predictive biomarkers. At an early stage, the goal is not to precisely define the target population, but to not miss an efficacy signal that might be limited to a biomarker subgroup. In this work, we propose a one-arm two-stage early phase biomarker-guided design in the setting of an oncology trial where at the time of the interim analysis, several decisions can be made regarding stopping the entire trial early or continuing to recruit patients from the full or a selected patient population. Via simulations, we show that, although the sample size is limited, the proposed design leads to better decision-making compared to a classical design that does not consider an enrichment expansion.

Keywords: continuous biomarker; early phase; personalized medicine; predictive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.G. and S.G. are the employees of Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier. G.S.‐H. is President of Saryga SAS. P.M. and A.S. served as statistical consultants for Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier and Saryga SAS.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Panel (a): schematic of the decision rules at the IA for the original design. Panel (b): schematic of the decision rules at the IA for the biomarker‐guided design.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Top Panel: decisions at the IA for the proposed design. Middle Panel: overall decisions at the end of the trial for both designs regardless of the population and the timing of the analysis for all scenarios. Bottom Panel: conditional decisions at the end of the trial for the proposed design with full or sub‐population or regardless of the population conditional on continuing to the second stage for all scenarios.

References

    1. Antoniou M., Jorgensen A. L., and Kolamunnage‐Dona R., “Biomarker‐Guided Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review,” PLoS One 11, no. 2 (2016): e0149803. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Superchi C., Bouvier F. B., Gerardi C., et al., “Study Designs for Clinical Trials Applied to Personalised Medicine: A Scoping Review,” BMJ Open 12, no. 5 (2022): e052926. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration , “Enrichment Strategies for Clinical Trials to Support Approval of Human Drugs and Biological Products,” 2019.
    1. Serra A., Geronimi J., Guilleminot S., et al., “A Novel Approach to Assess the Predictiveness of a Continuous Biomarker in Early Phases of Drug Development,” Statistics in Medicine 44, no. 5 (2025): e70026. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pallmann P., Bedding A. W., Choodari‐Oskooei B., et al., “Adaptive Designs in Clinical Trials: Why Use Them, and How to Run and Report Them,” BMC Medicine 16 (2018): 1–15. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources