Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Dec;135(6):1663-1683.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.08.037. Epub 2025 Oct 8.

Optimising postoperative spine outcomes: an umbrella review of enhanced recovery after spinal surgery (ERASS) protocols

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Optimising postoperative spine outcomes: an umbrella review of enhanced recovery after spinal surgery (ERASS) protocols

Daniel Sescu et al. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve recovery, reduce complications, and optimise surgical outcomes. Despite increasing use in spinal surgery, no standardised ERAS for spinal surgery (ERASS) exists and evidence synthesis is limited. This umbrella review consolidates findings from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of ERASS and identify research gaps.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science (1990-2024) identified SRs and MAs on ERASS. Data extraction followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR), with quality assessed using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS. Overlapping primary studies were removed before recalculating pooled estimates using fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Primary outcomes included length of stay, postoperative complications, readmission rates, healthcare costs, pain scores, and opioid consumption.

Results: Seventeen SRs and 55 MAs (319 primary studies; n=221 605 participants) were included. ERASS significantly reduced length of stay (-1.55 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.83 to -1.27 days; P<0.01), postoperative complications (relative risk=0.61; 95% CI 0.52-0.72; P<0.01), opioid consumption (-7.26 mg morphine equivalents; 95% CI -10.82 to -3.70 mg; P<0.01), and healthcare costs (-$1029.41 per patient; 95% CI -$1630.17 to -$428.65; P<0.01). Readmission rates were not significantly impacted (relative risk=0.91; P=0.38). Pain scores showed a modest, non-significant reduction (-0.27; 95% CI -0.66 to 0.13; P=0.19). High heterogeneity was observed, reflecting protocol and design variation.

Conclusions: ERASS protocols significantly improve surgical efficiency and safety. Standardised guidelines and future research addressing heterogeneity, under-represented ERASS elements, and long-term outcomes are needed.

Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42024578786).

Keywords: ERAS; enhanced recovery after surgery; perioperative; protocol; spinal surgery; spine; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources