Management of individuals with heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
- PMID: 41070818
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101557
Management of individuals with heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Abstract
Purpose: RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) are associated with increased lifetime risks of tubo-ovarian cancer. Resources for managing RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 heterozygotes in clinical practice are limited.
Methods: An international workgroup developed a Clinical Practice Resource to guide management of RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 heterozygotes using peer-reviewed publications and expert opinion.
Results: RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 are moderate (intermediate) penetrance ovarian cancer predisposition genes. Ovarian cancer risks for individuals with RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 GPVs may be influenced by family history and other modifiers. RAD51C and RAD51D GPVs are also associated with moderate risk of breast cancer, predominantly triple-negative subtype. RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 heterozygotes should be offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy close to the age of menopause based on age-specific risks and shared decision making. For RAD51C and RAD51D heterozygotes, enhanced breast surveillance may be indicated according to their personalized risk estimate and country-specific guidelines. Generally, risk-reducing mastectomy is not recommended. For RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 heterozygotes who develop cancer, there is insufficient evidence to guide any specific targeted treatment.
Conclusion: Systematic prospective data collection is needed to establish the outcomes of RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 associated cancers and particularly response to cancer treatment and survival.
Keywords: BRIP1; Cancer predisposition; Cancer risk; RAD51C; RAD51D.
Copyright © 2025 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Funding and support listed here did not support development of this document unless included in the acknowledgments section. All workgroup members receive salary for providing clinical services that may be relevant to the content of this document in either the laboratory or patient care setting at their listed affiliations. The following workgroup members have additional conflicts of interest: J.N. (AstraZeneca [research and education grants], Nalagenetics, Nanopore, and Pacbio [research funding]); M.T. (National Institute for Health, Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre [research funding]); T.P. (National Cancer Institute, Komen Foundation, Breast Cancer Research Foundation [research funding]); D.R.S. (Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics of the National Cancer Institute, Genome Medical, Inc [contract clinical telehealth services]); H.H. (Cancer Research CRUK Catalyst Award, CanGene-CanVar, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Exeter Biomedical Research Centre [research funding] and AstraZeneca [advisory board]). All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
