Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 13:151:104610.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104610. Online ahead of print.

Perceptions of care providers on the implementation of an antenatal psychosocial clinical decision support system: the Born in Belgium Professionals platform

Affiliations

Perceptions of care providers on the implementation of an antenatal psychosocial clinical decision support system: the Born in Belgium Professionals platform

Amuli Kelly et al. Midwifery. .

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can enhance care processes and clinical outcomes. Adoption depends not only on perceived usefulness but also on contextual human, organisational, and technical factors. Understanding care providers' perception and how these factors influence adoption is essential for implementing systems that can be embedded in routine perinatal practice.

Aim: To examine the real-world adoption (or uptake) of the Born in Belgium Professionals antenatal psychosocial decision-support platform, describing how and why care providers use it and identifying facilitators and barriers to sustained implementation.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of all active users (March-July 2024) captured frequency of use, motivations, and perceptions. Frequent versus non-frequent users were compared with chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests (p < .05).

Findings: Of 313 users, 127 responded; most were midwives working in large organisations. About 46% were frequent users. Motivators were the psychosocial questionnaire, continuity of care and preventive benefit. Frequent users more often attended training (64.4% vs 30.9%; p < 0.001), perceived greater patient benefit (median 4.5 vs 4.0; p = .046) and rated the platform's integration in electronic health record (EHR) higher (median 5.5 vs 5.0; p = .002). Non-frequent users cited time pressure and interoperability issues.

Discussion: Positive perceptions of benefits, adequate training, and seamless workflow integration promote sustained use. Organisational support and robust interoperability further facilitate uptake, whereas time pressures and suboptimal EHR embedding hinder regular use.

Conclusion: Implementation strategies that emphasise training, interoperability, and alignment with existing workflows are essential to optimise adoption of antenatal psychosocial decision-support systems.

Keywords: Clinical decision support systems; Digital health technology; Implementation science; Integrated care; Pregnancy; Psychosocial care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests. The implementation of the BIB-Pro platform was funded by the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI-INAMI-RIZIV). They had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit for publication.

LinkOut - more resources