Sex differences in attentional visual processing but not in plasticity-related modulation of visually evoked potentials
- PMID: 41072602
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109135
Sex differences in attentional visual processing but not in plasticity-related modulation of visually evoked potentials
Abstract
Impaired neuroplasticity is a core feature underlying many psychiatric disorders. Long-term potentiation (LTP)-like modulation of visually evoked potentials (VEPs), measured via EEG, represents a promising approach to assess plasticity in humans. Recent evidence indicates potential sex differences in VEP-based plasticity. This study investigated sex differences in visual cortical processing and plasticity by quantifying LTP-like modulation of VEPs. We analysed 96 available recordings from 61 women (mean age = 26.53 ± 6.87 years) and 35 men (mean age = 28.77 ± 8.63 years). VEPs were elicited using a checkerboard reversal stimulus (20 s at 2 Hz), presented before and after a 10-minute visual modulation. Post-modulation VEPs were recorded at 2, 8, 12, 18, 22, and 28 min. Amplitude changes from baseline to post-modulation were assessed. Predefined VEP components were analysed using linear mixed-effects models (LMEM), and time-resolved sex differences were evaluated via cluster-based permutation testing. LTP-like modulation was evident in early VEP components-specifically C1, P1, and P1N1 peak-to-peak amplitude indicating dynamic changes in early visual processing from 2 to 8 min post-stimulation. LMEM did not reveal any sex-specific effects in these components. However, time-course analyses identified discrete, significant sex differences in late VEP components in late VEP components at baseline (350-390 ms; p = .043) and 18 min post-modulation (388-426 ms; p = .048). Our findings demonstrate robust LTP-like modulation in early VEP components independent of sex. Subtle sex differences emerged in late, unmodulated VEP components (350-426 ms), likely reflecting variations in attention-related processing rather than plasticity per se.
Keywords: Attention; Biomarkers; Neuropsychiatry; Sex differences; Synaptic plasticity; Visually evoked potentials.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
