A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of 308-nm Light-Emitting Diode and 308-nm Monochromatic Excimer Lamp in the Treatment of Pediatric Vitiligo
- PMID: 41074622
- DOI: 10.1111/phpp.70059
A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of 308-nm Light-Emitting Diode and 308-nm Monochromatic Excimer Lamp in the Treatment of Pediatric Vitiligo
Abstract
Introduction: Vitiligo, a common depigmentation disorder, is often treated with phototherapy. 308-nm monochromatic excimer lamp/laser (308-nm MEL) is typically administered in hospitals, whereas 308-nm light-emitting diodes (308-nm LED) offer a home-based alternative. This study compared the efficacy and safety of home-based 308-nm LED with hospital-based 308-nm MEL in pediatric vitiligo.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 75 pediatric vitiligo patients treated with home-based 308-nm LED or hospital-based 308-nm MEL was conducted. Efficacy (repigmentation > 50%) and adverse events were evaluated after 16, 32, and 48 sessions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0.
Results: After 48 sessions, hospital-based 308-nm MEL showed higher efficacy rates (79.5%) than home-based 308-nm LED (38.9%, p < 0.001). However, efficacy was similar when cumulative doses were comparable (p > 0.05). Adverse events were more frequent in the home-based group (63.9% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.029), likely due to cautious dose adjustments. Shorter disease duration and stable disease correlated with better outcomes (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Home-based 308-nm LED is a viable alternative to hospital-based 308-nm MEL for pediatric vitiligo when cumulative doses are similar. However, higher adverse events in home-based therapy highlight the need for better patient education and professional guidance. AI and digital platforms could enhance the safety and efficacy of home-based phototherapy.
Keywords: 308‐nm light emitting diodes; 308‐nm monochromatic excimer lamp; pediatric; vitiligo.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- C. Bergqvist and K. Ezzedine, “Vitiligo: A Review,” Dermatology 236, no. 6 (2020): 571–592, https://doi.org/10.1159/000506103.
-
- E. Nicolaidou, S. Mastraftsi, V. Tzanetakou, and D. Rigopoulos, “Childhood Vitiligo,” American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 20, no. 4 (2019): 515–526, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257‐019‐00430‐0.
-
- M. Böhm, J. A. Schunter, K. Fritz, et al., “S1 Guideline: Diagnosis and Therapy of Vitiligo,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 20, no. 3 (2022): 365–378, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14713.
-
- Y. Dong, Q. Yang, B. Guo, J. Zhu, and X. Sun, “The Effects of Tacrolimus Plus Phototherapy in the Treatment of Vitiligo,” Archives of Dermatological Research 313, no. 6 (2021): 461–471, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403‐020‐02121‐x.
-
- R. Bouceiro Mendes, M. Alpalhão, and P. Filipe, “UVB Phototherapy in the Treatment of Vitiligo: State of the Art and Clinical,” Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine 38, no. 3 (2022): 215–223.