Identifying the possible candidate population for adjuvant radiotherapy de-escalation for intermediate-risk cervical cancer
- PMID: 41075563
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102674
Identifying the possible candidate population for adjuvant radiotherapy de-escalation for intermediate-risk cervical cancer
Abstract
Objective: To explore whether there is a possible candidate population for treatment de-escalation with active surveillance without adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with stage IB cervical cancer meeting the intermediate-risk criteria.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study queried the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database in the United States. The study population included 1133 patients with node-negative, parametria-free, surgical margin-uninvolved, stage IB intermediate-risk cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm with lymphovascular space invasion, or tumor size of >4 cm regardless of lymphovascular space invasion) who had primary radical hysterectomy and lymph node evaluation from 2010 to 2022. Exposure was adjuvant radiotherapy status: external beam radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (n = 642) or active surveillance without radiotherapy (n = 491). The main outcome measure was overall survival, assessed in a propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort.
Results: At the whole-cohort level, hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality comparing adjuvant radiotherapy de-escalation to adjuvant radiotherapy was 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 1.86, p = .13). When stratified by histology type, adjuvant radiotherapy de-escalation was associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in squamous cell carcinoma (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.34, p = .038) but not in adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma (HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.75, p = .75). When stratified by tumor differentiation, adjuvant radiotherapy de-escalation was associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in poorly-differentiated tumors (HR, 2.11; 95% CI 1.29 to 3.42, p =.003) but not in well- to moderately-differentiated tumors (HR, 0.83; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.37, p = .47).
Conclusion: The results of this cohort study in the United States suggest that overall survival benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy for study-defined intermediate-risk stage IB cervical cancer may vary based on histology type and tumor differentiation. Specifically, patients with squamous cell carcinoma or poorly-differentiated tumors benefited from receiving adjuvant radiotherapy, while those with adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma or well- to moderately-differentiated tumors did not. Whether there may be candidates for treatment de-escalation in intermediate-risk cervical cancer warrants further investigation with a prospective design.
Keywords: Adjuvant Radiotherapy; Cervical Cancer; De-Escalation; Intermediate Risk; Overall Survival.
Copyright © 2025 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest All were outside the work: consultant, Asieres Oncology, Glaxo Smith Kline, Nutcracker Therapeutics, participation in the Steering Committee for the Global Coalition of Adaptive Research, and a leadership role for the Lynne Cohen Foundation (LDR).
