Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Oct 1;31(Supplement_2):S61-S70.
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaf212.

How Should an IBD Prevention Trial Be Designed?

Affiliations
Review

How Should an IBD Prevention Trial Be Designed?

Rogier L Goetgebuer et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Advances in understanding disease pathogenesis have revealed a preclinical phase of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering a potential window for preventive measures. There is growing interest in trials to prevent IBD in at-risk individuals. However, there is limited guidance on how to set up prevention trials in IBD. This review aims to outline key considerations for designing an IBD prevention trial.

Methods: We conducted a review of the literature, gaining insight from prevention trials in other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We focused on considerations to set up a secondary prevention trial regarding design, risk stratification and selection strategies, inclusion and exclusion criteria, endpoints, and ethical considerations.

Results: Across IMIDs in which features predictive of future risk have been identified, trials have leveraged well-characterized at-risk cohorts, biomarkers for disease prediction, and feasible interventions. Key elements to consider include (1) identification and longitudinal monitoring of at-risk individuals based on biomarkers, (2) clear definitions of inclusion and exclusion criteria distinguishing a primary prevention trial to prevent disease in at-risk individuals from a secondary prevention trial in individuals with signs of subclinical disease, (3) use of time-to-event endpoints, (4) risk-benefit balancing in intervention choice, and (5) engagement of at-risk individuals. In IBD, analogous strategies are emerging and first-degree relatives stand out as a group for screening. Significant challenges remain in defining risk thresholds, optimizing endpoints, and selected interventions.

Conclusion: Prevention trials in IBD hold promise but require careful design informed by experiences from other IMIDs. Central to this effort are the development of validated predictive tools, ethically appropriate interventions, and international collaboration to assemble well-powered at-risk cohorts.

Keywords: Crohn’s disease; inflammatory bowel disease; interception; prevention; trial design; ulcerative colitis.

Plain language summary

This review outlines key design principles for inflammatory bowel disease prevention trials, drawing on lessons from other immune-mediated diseases. It highlights the importance of risk stratification, early biomarkers, ethical interventions, and collaborative efforts to advance precision prevention in inflammatory bowel disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources