Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025;20(3):241-250.
doi: 10.5114/pg.2025.154599. Epub 2025 Sep 24.

Summary of gastroscopy quality indicators applicable in clinical practice

Affiliations
Review

Summary of gastroscopy quality indicators applicable in clinical practice

Mikołaj Machaj et al. Prz Gastroenterol. 2025.

Abstract

Despite advances in medicine, upper gastrointestinal cancers remain a significant global concern. In Poland, regardless of the increase in performed esophagogastroduodenoscopies, the rate of missed cancers is around 6%. This is related to the insufficient quality measures during the performed examinations. Our paper discusses key endoscopy quality indicators that can enhance the detection of precancerous lesions and cancers. We categorized the indicators into three sections: pre-procedural (fasting time, premedication), intra-procedural (sedation, photodocumentation, virtual chromoendoscopy, quality metrics, biopsy sampling) and post-procedural (coordinated care, training). Some of them, such as chromoendoscopy and premedication in the upper segment, have been widely studied and popularized in recent years. For several years, we have had strict protocols on how to take specimens depending on the condition. Most of the assumptions presented can be easily implemented into daily routine practice, which can improve health care. These are successfully, routinely used in Japan and Korea. We believe that a collective improvement in the quality of esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed will increase the detection rates of precancerous lesions and early cancers. However, further research in this area is still needed.

Keywords: esophageal cancer; esophagogastroduodenoscopy; gastric cancer; quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74: 229-63. - PubMed
    1. Morgan E, Arnold M, Camargo MC, et al. The current and future incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in 185 countries, 2020–40: a population-based modelling study. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 47: 101404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Marcos-Pinto R, et al. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 365-88. - PubMed
    1. Pimenta-Melo AR, Monteiro-Soares M, Libânio D, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Missing rate for gastric cancer during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28: 1041-9. - PubMed
    1. Januszewicz W, Witczak K, Wieszczy P, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of upper gastrointestinal cancers missed during endoscopy: a nationwide registry-based study. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 653-60. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources