Switching to subcutaneous administration may offer more profound remission compared to intensified intravenous therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and partial response following induction with intravenous vedolizumab: the PRIVEDO study
- PMID: 41081746
- DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf175
Switching to subcutaneous administration may offer more profound remission compared to intensified intravenous therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and partial response following induction with intravenous vedolizumab: the PRIVEDO study
Abstract
Background & aims: The optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with a partial response after intravenous (IV) vedolizumab (VDZ) induction remains unclear.
Methods: PRIVEDO was an observational, non-randomized, open-label, prospective cohort study conducted within the Sicilian Network for IBD. It compared subcutaneous (SC) VDZ (108 mg every 2 weeks) versus intensified IV VDZ (300 mg every 4 weeks) in Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with a partial response at Week 14 post-induction. Partial response was defined as: (1) clinical remission with fecal calprotectin >250 µg/g and/or steroid use, or (2) a reduction in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index by ≥3 points (for CD) or in the Partial Mayo Score by ≥2 points (for UC) from baseline, without fulfilling clinical remission criteria. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission with fecal calprotectin <250 µg/g at Weeks 26 and 52. The secondary endpoints were clinical benefit (remission or partial response), regardless of calprotectin values, and treatment persistence.
Results: 107 patients were enrolled (CD: 58/107, 54.2%; UC: 49/107, 45.8%), allocated to SC (n = 52) or IV (n = 55) groups. The primary endpoint was met more often with SC VDZ at Week 26 (30/52, 57.7% vs. 14/55, 25.5%; P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 3.57, P = 0.004 at multivariable analysis) and at Week 52 (25/52, 48.1% vs. 14/55, 25.5%; P = 0.016; OR: 3.05, P = .029 at multivariable analysis). Clinical benefit was also higher in the SC group at both timepoints, though not statistically significant. Treatment persistence was comparable between the 2 groups (log-rank test, P = .225).
Conclusions: In IBD patients with partial response to IV VDZ induction, switching to SC VDZ may lead to more profound remission than continuing IV optimization.
Keywords: Crohn’s disease; biologics; precision medicine; ulcerative colitis.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
