Investigation of narcotics and antitussives using drug discrimination techniques
- PMID: 41087
Investigation of narcotics and antitussives using drug discrimination techniques
Abstract
Rats learned drug discriminations in a shock-escape T-maze task. They were trained to turn right in the maze following injection of a drug (D) and left when no injection (N) was given. Number of training sessions before criterion performance (STC) was used to indicate degree of discriminability of the training drug. STC decreased monotonically as dosage increased, and reached a minimum of 3 to 26 with various agonists. Most agonists were not highly discriminable. Daily maintenance injections of morphine, 200 to 600 mg/kg, increased the STC of morphine, 15 mg/kg, significantly, but complete tolerance to discriminable drug actions was not observed. After rats discriminated D vs. N, they were tested with novel drugs to determine which would elicit D choices. Most morphine-like agonists substituted for one another during substitution tests; the tested agonists included alphaprodine, codeine, fentanyl, heroin, meperidine, methadone, morphine, piminodine and propoxyphene. In a few instances, one of these agonists failed to substitute for another. Naloxone and naltrexone antagonized the discriminable effects of morphine. Cyclazocine, levallorphan, naltrexone, dextromethorphan, ethoheptazine and the narcotic agonists did not substitute for one another, suggesting that six dissimilar discriminable effects were produced by these drugs.
Similar articles
-
Discriminative stimulus properties of U50,488 and morphine: effects of training dose on stimulus substitution patterns produced by mu and kappa opioid agonists.J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990 Jul;254(1):13-22. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990. PMID: 2164087
-
Discriminative stimulus effects of the mixed-opioid agonist/antagonist dezocine: cross-substitution by mu and delta opioid agonists.J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Dec;283(3):1009-17. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997. PMID: 9399970
-
Sensitization and tolerance to the discriminative stimulus effects of mu-opioid agonists.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 May;114(4):601-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02244991. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994. PMID: 7855222
-
Discriminative stimulus properties of dextromethorphan in rats.Biomed Pharmacother. 1995;49(10):456-64. doi: 10.1016/0753-3322(96)82690-4. Biomed Pharmacother. 1995. PMID: 8746072 Review.
-
THE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF MORPHINE AND ITS SUBSTITUTES AS ANALGESICS.Pharmacol Rev. 1964 Mar;16:47-83. Pharmacol Rev. 1964. PMID: 14165239 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.Behav Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;22(5-6):415-29. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328349ab37. Behav Pharmacol. 2011. PMID: 21808191 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Environmental modification of tolerance to morphine discriminative stimulus properties in rats.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;93(1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02439587. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987. PMID: 3114815
-
Subjective, behavioral and physiological responses to intravenous meperidine in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;111(3):306-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02244946. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993. PMID: 7870968 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982;76(4):385-95. doi: 10.1007/BF00449130. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982. PMID: 6812113
-
Discriminative stimulus properties of naloxone in Long-Evans rats: assessment with the conditioned taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Apr;203(2):421-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1233-5. Epub 2008 Jul 2. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009. PMID: 18594795 Free PMC article.