Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Oct 13;12(1):e001944.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001944.

Patient experience of colon capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a structured, comparative patient survey

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patient experience of colon capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a structured, comparative patient survey

Veronica Dale et al. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Objective: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a recognised diagnostic tool, but there is little research exploring patient experience of this relatively new technology. We aimed to understand the patient experience of CCE and explore similarities to and differences from colonoscopy and CT colonography (CTC).

Methods: We conducted a structured patient experience survey exploring preprocedural, procedural and postprocedural elements of CCE, alongside colonoscopy and CTC, using descriptive statistics. Consenting patients were recruited from the NHS England CCE pilot, referred either on a suspected colorectal cancer or a 3-year postpolypectomy surveillance pathway.

Results: 927 of 1937 patients (48%) responded to the survey invitation. 486 had CCE as their index procedure, 399 colonoscopy and 42 CTC. Two per cent of CCE patients found the procedure painful compared with 21% of colonoscopy and 12% of CTC patients (p<0.001). The CCE procedural information was easily understood by 81% of patients compared with 92% having colonoscopy (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the bowel preparation experience with 20% of CCE and 16% of colonoscopy patients experiencing severe or more discomfort (p=0.439). However, 19% of CCE patients felt the bowel preparation would put them off a future CCE compared with 8% of colonoscopy patients (p<0.001). This was not wholly explained by the need for further investigations. Using regression analysis, we found that high-quality preprocedural information, tolerability of bowel preparation, procedural comfort and investigative closure were predictors of patient satisfaction with CCE. 74% of patients were satisfied with CCE in diagnosing or reassuring them compared with 91% in colonoscopy and 80% in CTC (p<0.001).

Conclusions: CCE was similarly or better tolerated than colonoscopy and CTC throughout the patient journey, with significantly less pain experienced. A future CCE clinical service should ensure that the patient is well informed and optimise the likelihood of the investigative closure.

Keywords: COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL DISEASES; ENDOSCOPY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. England N Clinical guide for triaging patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms. 2020
    1. England N Clinical guide for using colon capsule endoscopy in the lower gastrointestinal pathway. 2022
    1. (NICE) NICE . London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. - PubMed
    1. Rutter MD, East J, Rees CJ, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines. Gut. 2020;69:201–23. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spada C, Hassan C, Galmiche JP, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2012;44:527–36. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291717. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources