Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;49(5):889-907.
doi: 10.1007/s10755-024-09728-2. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Examining a Critical Race Theory-Informed Undergraduate Research Experience: Proposing a Conceptual Model of the Benefits of Anti-Racist Programs on Student Development

Affiliations

Examining a Critical Race Theory-Informed Undergraduate Research Experience: Proposing a Conceptual Model of the Benefits of Anti-Racist Programs on Student Development

Frank Fernandez et al. Innov High Educ. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Hate crimes and racist incidents are occurring with alarming and increasing frequency on college and university campuses. As colleges work to reduce racist incidents on campus, there is still a need to prepare students to respond to racism when it occurs. When students are prepared to respond to racist incidents, they tend to have better mental health. We draw on prior literature to examine whether learning about critical race theory (CRT) and receiving CRT-informed mentoring-as embedded in an undergraduate research experience program-related to four-year college students' self-assessed ability to respond to racism. Specifically, we propose and test a conceptual model to examine the benefits of participating in an undergraduate research experience program that required students to learn about CRT and receiving CRT-informed mentorship. Consistent with prior literature on undergraduate research experience programs, we found that the intervention positively related to students' sense of self-efficacy and science identity, but it did not have an independent, direct relationship with self-assessed ability to respond to racism. However, the intervention indirectly supports students' preparedness to respond to racism through its positive relationship with self-efficacy. As state legislatures around the country work to ban CRT, this paper offers empirical evidence that embedding CRT in university programs can support student development in multiple related ways.

Keywords: Anti-racism; Mentoring; STEM; Undergraduate research experiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hypothesized relationships among outcomes related to participating in undergraduate research experience program informed by CRT
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Direct and indirect effects of participating in an undergraduate research experience program informed by CRT, testing development of meaning
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Direct and indirect effects of participating in an undergraduate research experience program informed by CRT, testing thriving

References

    1. Alexander TN (2023). Efforts to ban critical race theory have been put forth in all but one state – and many threaten schools with a loss of funds. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/efforts-to-ban-critical-race-theory-have-bee...
    1. Apriceno M, Levy SR, & London B (2020). Mentorship during college transition predicts academic self-efficacy and sense of belonging among STEM students. Journal of College Student Development, 61(5), 643–648. 10.1353/csd.2020.0061 - DOI
    1. Arshad M (2024). Reported hate crimes at schools and colleges are on the rise, new FBI report says. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/01/29/fbi-reported-hate-...
    1. Bandura A (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 - DOI
    1. Basu SJ (2010). A researcher-student-teacher model for democratic science pedagogy: Connections to community, shared authority, and critical science agency. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 72–87. 10.1080/10665680903489379 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources