Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep-Oct;32(5):e451-e457.
doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000002015.

Therapeutic Advances in Rectal Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Therapeutic Advances in Rectal Cancer

Alain David Medina Lago et al. Am J Ther. 2025 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Inferior rectal cancer, a malignancy occurring in the lower portion of the rectum, represents a significant clinical challenge due to its complex anatomical location and the diverse treatment approaches required for optimal patient outcomes. Over the past few decades, advancements in surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments have contributed to improving survival rates and minimizing morbidity associated with this disease.

Areas of uncertainty: Neoadjuvant therapy combined with tumor resection surgery has demonstrated significant improvements in survival in patients with rectal cancer. However, uncertainty persists due to variability in therapeutic responses among different groups of patients and the limited availability of long-term data on the efficacy of pathologic responses. These limitations affirm the need for further studies to optimize and personalize the therapeutic approach to rectal cancer.

Data sources: A search for information was conducted using recognized databases, including Cochrane, PubMed, Scielo, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. The search strategy was designed using specific terms such as: "rectal neoplasms" OR ("rectal AND neoplasms") OR "rectal cancer" AND ("therapeutics" OR "treatments"), to identify relevant publications.

Therapeutic advances: Minimally invasive techniques offer oncologic outcomes equivalent to open surgery with faster recovery and lower morbidity, supported by total neoadjuvant therapy, which has become the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer, achieving higher pathologic complete response rates (OR 2.44, 95% CI, 1.99-2.98) and longer disease-free survival (OR 2.07, 95% CI, 1.20-3.56) than conventional chemoradiotherapy. In addition, emerging targeted agents (VEGF and EGFR inhibitors) in molecularly selected patients and PD-1 blockade in dMMR tumors further improve response rates and support organ preservation strategies.

Conclusions: Despite notable advances in treatment strategies for rectal cancer, challenges remain in identifying a therapeutic modality that can improve both overall survival and disease-free survival without exposing the patient to overly aggressive interventions.

Keywords: monoclonal antibodies; neoadjuvant therapy; rectal cancer; rectal neoplasm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908). CA: A Cancer J Clin. 1971;21:361–364.
    1. Dixon CF. Anterior resection for malignant lesions of the upper part of the rectum and lower part of the sigmoid. Ann Surg. 1948;128:425–442.
    1. Diers J, Wagner J, Baum P, et al. Nationwide in‐hospital mortality rate following rectal resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany. BJS Open. 2020;4:310–319.
    1. Diers J, Baum P, Matthes H, et al. Mortality and complication management after surgery for colorectal cancer depending on the DKG minimum amounts for hospital volume. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:850–857.
    1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Adam M, et al. NCCN Guidelines® insights: rectal cancer, version 3.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024;22:366–375.

LinkOut - more resources