Five-year prospective outcomes of medical management and microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia
- PMID: 41102594
- PMCID: PMC12532645
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-13447-9
Five-year prospective outcomes of medical management and microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia
Abstract
Background: Trigeminal neuralgia is a severe facial pain disorder with major impact on quality of life. Long-term prospective data comparing medical and surgical treatments remain scarce. This study compared 5-year outcomes of medical management and microvascular decompression (MVD) and explored predictors of treatment response.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study at a national referral center (2012-2019). Consecutive patients with classical or idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia underwent MRI, baseline assessment, and systematic 5-year follow-up. Treatment allocation (medical therapy or MVD) followed clinical evaluation and international guidelines. The primary outcome was categorized as pain-free without medication, pain-free with medication, continued pain without medication, or continued pain with medication.
Results: Of 626 eligible patients, 227 completed follow-up (95 MVD, 132 medical). Pain-free without medication was achieved in 59% of MVD patients versus 19% of medically treated [relative risk (RR) 3.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-5.50]. Pain-free with medication occurred in 1% after MVD versus 14% of the medical cohort (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.69). Continued pain on medication was less frequent after MVD (22% vs 49%; RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.80). Male sex predicted excellent outcome after MVD (odds ratio 2.60, 95% CI 1.02-6.91). Postoperative hypoesthesia occurred in 23% and hearing impairment in 7%, while 55% of medically treated patients reported side effects.
Conclusions: MVD provided superior long-term pain relief, higher rates of medication-free pain freedom, and reduced medication use compared with medical management, supporting earlier surgical consideration in selected patients and emphasizing individualized, guideline-based care.
Keywords: Anticonvulsants; Cohort studies; Facial pain; MDT; MVD; Multidisciplinary; Neurosurgery; Observational study; Pain management; Sex differences.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: JW serves as PI in an RCT sponsored by Noema Pharma, has received a scholarship grant from Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, and travel support for congress attendance from Lundbeck and Novartis. LB has given lectures and served on the scientific advisory board for AbbVie, Pfizer, and Teva. HWS has received consultant fees from Lundbeck, Pfizer, AbbVie, Lilly, and Novartis.
Figures
References
-
- Olesen J (2018) Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38:1–211
-
- Zakrzewska JM, Wu J, Mon-Williams M, Phillips N, Pavitt SH (2017) Evaluating the impact of trigeminal neuralgia. Pain 158:1166–1174 - PubMed
-
- Tan C-Y, Shahrizaila N, Goh K-J (2017) Clinical characteristics, pain, and quality of life experiences of trigeminal neuralgia in a multi-ethnic Asian Cohort. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 31:e15–e20 - PubMed
-
- Hilgenberg-Sydney PB, Calles BM, Conti PCR (2015) Quality of life in chronic trigeminal neuralgia patients. Rev Dor 16:195–197
-
- Tölle T, Dukes E, Sadosky A (2006) Patient burden of trigeminal neuralgia: results from a cross-sectional survey of health state impairment and treatment patterns in six European countries. Pain Pract 6:153–160 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
