Development of a predictive model for nafamostat mesylate dosing in hemodialysis
- PMID: 41102652
- DOI: 10.1186/s12882-025-04520-6
Development of a predictive model for nafamostat mesylate dosing in hemodialysis
Abstract
Background: Nafamostat mesylate, an anticoagulant with a short half-life, is useful during hemodialysis for patients at high risk of bleeding. Research on the appropriate dosage of nafamostat has been insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the optimal dosage of nafamostat using a dosage prediction model.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records from 12 centers affiliated with Yeolin Medical Foundation over an 8-month period. Candidate predictor variables were evaluated using bootstrapping and stepwise regression to determine feature importance. Predictive models were compared based on performance metrics.
Results: In total, 308 sessions from 88 patients without dialyzer clotting were selected. The average nafamostat dose was 21.90 ± 6.82 mg/h. The top four important features were oral anticoagulant use, dry body weight, age, and hemoglobin level. The best-performing model using 12 variables showed a root mean squared error of 4.11 mg/h and an adjusted R² value of 0.49. Multivariable linear regression showed that oral anticoagulant use (coefficient - 14.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] -18.28 to -10.12, P < 0.001) and age (-0.13, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.08, P < 0.001) were associated with a lower nafamostat dose, whereas dry body weight (coefficient 0.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.22, P < 0.001) and hemoglobin level (1.13, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.76, P < 0.001) were associated with a higher dose.
Conclusion: The nafamostat dosage prediction model can be used to calculate the dose required for individual patients. However, further studies for model improvement and external validation are required.
Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Keywords: Anticoagulant; Dosage prediction; Hemodialysis; Nafamostat.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Bioethics and Safety Act of the Republic of Korea. The study was approved by the Public Institutional Review Board of the Republic of Korea (Approval No. P01-202408-01-011). The requirement for informed consent was waived by the IRB due to the retrospective nature of the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources