Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 1:12:1622800.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1622800. eCollection 2025.

Iron EDTA ingestion and toxicosis in 61 dogs: a multicenter retrospective study of Australian hospital records

Affiliations

Iron EDTA ingestion and toxicosis in 61 dogs: a multicenter retrospective study of Australian hospital records

Elvany Luswanto et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: There is limited published information on iron toxicosis in dogs, and it is unclear if dogs follow the four stages of progression as in humans. The objective of this retrospective case series was to describe the clinical course and treatment of dogs presenting after iron EDTA ingestion.

Methods: Cases were retrieved through an electronic medical records search at three veterinary teaching hospitals and three private referral hospitals in Australia. Non-parametric descriptive statistics are reported.

Results: 61 dogs met the inclusion criteria. The most common iron-containing product ingested was iron EDTA molluscicide (60/61), with only one dog ingesting iron EDTA plant fertilizer. Notably, 20 out of 61 dogs (32.8%) had no clinical signs before presentation. Vomiting without blood was the most common clinical sign (21), followed by lethargy (16), diarrhea without blood (15), ataxia/weakness (12), and signs consistent with abdominal pain (10). Abdominal pain was the most common physical examination finding (21), followed by dehydration (10). Forty dogs underwent some form of gastrointestinal decontamination. The median pre-chelation serum iron concentration was 61.3 μmol/L (Min-Max 9-356, n = 40), while the median post-chelation concentration was 14.7 μmol/L (5.72-44, n = 22). Overall, 10 dogs were managed as outpatients, while 51 dogs were treated as inpatients. Inpatient treatments included desferoxamine (43), gastroprotectants (41), antiemetics and/or prokinetics (36), analgesia (24), and hepatoprotectants (4). The most common protocol for desferoxamine administration was a continuous intravenous infusion at 15 mg/kg/h (n = 27); other dogs received 40 mg/kg intramuscularly (n = 13). Two dogs had an anaphylactic reaction to an inadvertent bolus of desferoxamine, while two had allergic reactions possibly related to desferoxamine. Two dogs developed neutropenia, and one developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, possibly as a result of desferoxamine treatment. Overall, 91.8% of dogs survived to discharge. One dog died during hospitalization, experiencing cardiac arrhythmias, shock, and cardiac arrest despite treatment. When considering the stage of iron toxicoses, 16/61 (26.2%) dogs never developed clinical toxicosis, 44 dogs (72.1%) had evidence of Stage 1 clinical signs, 4 dogs (6.6%) also had evidence of Stage 2 clinical signs, and 19 dogs (31.1%) progressed to Stage 3 clinical signs. No dogs had Stage 4 clinical signs (delayed gastrointestinal stricture). A single case was euthanized for acute hepatic failure upon re-presentation after initial survival to discharge.

Conclusion: Iron EDTA toxicosis has a good prognosis in dogs following prompt treatment, but severe organ damage, including hepatic and cardiovascular dysfunction, can occur. Additionally, desferoxamine was well tolerated when administered according to published protocols, but potentially fatal adverse effects can occur.

Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); anaphylaxis; desferoxamine; diarrhea; hepatotoxicity; neutropenia; vomiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor MG declared a past co-authorship with one of the author CS and declared a shared committee with the author CS. The author (CS) declared that she was an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

References

    1. Hooser SB. Iron In: Gupta RC, editor. Veterinary toxicology: basic and clinical principles. Second ed. Oxford: Academic; (2012). 957–67.
    1. Binder HJ, Mansbach CM. Digestion and absorption of vitamins and minerals In: Boron WF, Boulpaep EL, editors. Medical physiology. Third ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; (2017). 939–41.
    1. Hall JO. Iron In: Talcott PA, Peterson ME, editors. Small animal toxicology. Third ed. Missouri Elsevier Saunders: St Louis; (2013). 595–600.
    1. Greentree WF, Hall JO. Iron Toxicosis In: Kirk RW, editor. Current veterinary therapy VIII small animal Pratice. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co; (1983). 240–2.
    1. Chang TP, Rangan C. Iron poisoning: a literature-based review of epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Pediatr Emerg Care. (2011) 27:978–85. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182302604, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources