Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 15;9(10):e25.00205.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00205. eCollection 2025 Oct 1.

Medialization of the Cup During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Affiliations

Medialization of the Cup During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Elizabeth Cho et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Placement of the acetabular cup, particularly regarding medialization of the cup, remains debated today. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether medialization of the acetabular cup during total hip arthroplasty (THA) using modern day implants affects the outcome of aseptic loosening.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent THA between 2007 and 2013 was done. Acetabular offset (AO) was measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Change in AO was defined as the postoperative minus the preoperative measurement.

Results: One hundred forty-nine total patients were included, consisting of 117 patients with long-term (10 years minimum) follow-up who did not require revision surgery and 31 patients who required revision due to aseptic loosening of the cup an average of 7.7 years after THA. Patients with no change or increase in AO (corresponding to no change or lateralization of hip center) had 2.9 times (95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 6.6; P = 0.0097) increased odds of aseptic loosening compared with those with a decrease in AO (corresponding to medialization of hip center). Patients who underwent revision for aseptic loosening had significantly greater change in AO compared with patients without revision surgery by 2.6 mm (0.7 mm increase in the revision group vs. 1.9 mm decrease in the nonrevision group; P = 0.013). Similarly, multivariate regression controlling for diabetes and Body Mass Index demonstrated a difference of 2.6 mm in mean AO change (P = 0.018).

Conclusion: Aseptic loosening was markedly associated with increased AO after THA, with nearly three times increased odds of aseptic loosening compared with those with decreased AO after THA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A, Radiographic parameters, preoperative. B, Radiographic parameters, postoperative. AB = acetabular offset (AO), BC = femoral offset (FO), AC = combined (global) offset, BD = vertical offset (VO), AE = acetabular floor width (AFW)

References

    1. Knight SR, Aujla R, Biswas SP: Total hip arthroplasty—Over 100 years of operative history. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2011;3:e16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meermans G, Doorn JV, Kats JJ: Restoration of the centre of rotation in primary total hip arthroplasty: The influence of acetabular floor depth and reaming technique. Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1597-1603. - PubMed
    1. Merle C, Innmann MM, Waldstein W, et al. : High variability of acetabular offset in primary hip osteoarthritis influences acetabular reaming—A computed tomography-based anatomic study. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:1808-1814. - PubMed
    1. Karachalios T, Hartofilakidis G, Zacharakis N, Tsekoura M: A 12- to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. The role of the center of rotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;296:140-147. - PubMed
    1. Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T, Saito T, Hirasawa Y, Kubo T: Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;388:135-142. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources