Enhancing Public Health Education Through Smart Learning Environments: Integrating Technology and Pedagogy
- PMID: 41112887
- PMCID: PMC12532516
- DOI: 10.1007/s40670-025-02408-6
Enhancing Public Health Education Through Smart Learning Environments: Integrating Technology and Pedagogy
Abstract
The landscape of public health education is transforming, and online learning technologies are rapidly being adopted. This narrative review examines how public health education has evolved by comparing traditional and online learning environments, focusing on how smart learning environments can enhance educational outcomes. The analysis is grounded in the community of inquiry framework, Gardner's theory on multiple intelligences, and the theory of self-regulated learning. This review first outlines the key competencies required by public health professionals, including epidemiology, health policy, and biostatistics, and then discusses how these competencies are taught traditionally. This description is followed by an exploration of online learning environments and the unique challenges faced by learners, such as the need for self-regulation and motivation. Smart learning environments should integrate adaptive learning technologies and personalized learning pathways to address these challenges and provide a more engaging and supportive learning experience. These technologies enable real-time feedback and customization of learning materials, allowing students to monitor their progress and adjust their learning strategies. Smart learning environments can also contribute to community and collaborative learning in online environments. Integrating smart learning environments into public health curricula can enhance student learning outcomes and prepare future public health professionals to navigate a rapidly changing digital world. The purpose of this review is to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the modernization of public health education by proposing a conceptual community of inquiry framework for smart learning environments, suggesting a balanced approach that leverages the strengths of traditional and online learning methods.
Keywords: Community of inquiry; Digital learning; Online teaching; Self-regulated learning; Smart learning environments.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Adesina OO, Adesina OA, Adelopo I, Afrifa GA. Managing group work: the impact of peer assessment on student engagement. Acc Educ. 2023;32(1):90–113. 10.1080/09639284.2022.2034023.
-
- Association of Schools of Public Health. ASPHA Projects. 2023. https://asphaafrica.net/about-us/aspha-projects/
-
- Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Vol. Handbook I: cognitive domain. David McKay Company. 1995
-
- Bouckaert M. The assessment of students’ creative and critical thinking skills in higher education across OECD countries. 2023. 10.1787/35dbd439-en
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources