Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial
- PMID: 41115959
- DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-04030-w
Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer provides uncertain benefit at the individual level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help refine risk-adjusted treatment selection. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 trial, patients with stage III colon cancer underwent ctDNA testing 5-6 weeks after surgery and were assigned (1:1) to ctDNA-guided or standard management. In the ctDNA-guided arm, patients negative for ctDNA received de-escalated therapy, whereas ctDNA-positive patients received escalated therapy. Clinicians prespecified the standard regimen. Primary endpoints were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ctDNA-negative patients and 2-year RFS for ctDNA-positive patients. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related hospitalization and ctDNA clearance. Among 968 evaluable patients, 702 (72.5%) were ctDNA negative. With a median follow-up of 47 months, ctDNA-negative patients experienced significantly fewer recurrences than ctDNA-positive patients (3-year RFS 87% versus 49%; P < 0.001). In ctDNA-negative patients, de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin use (34.8% versus 88.6%) and hospitalizations (8.5% versus 13.2%) but yielded slightly lower RFS than standard management (85.3% versus 88.1%), not meeting the non-inferiority margin. In ctDNA-positive patients, higher ctDNA burden correlated with recurrence risk (3-year RFS 77% to 23% across quartiles; P < 0.001). Escalated therapy did not improve outcomes over standard management (2-year RFS 51% versus 61%). There was no unexpected toxicity. Persistent ctDNA after treatment predicted markedly worse prognosis (3-year RFS 14% versus 79%). ctDNA is validated as a strong prognostic classifier. ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure and adverse events with outcomes approaching standard of care, whereas exploratory chemotherapy intensification conferred no RFS benefit, suggesting a need for novel strategies in ctDNA-positive disease.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617001566325 .
© 2025. Crown.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: J.T. has served as an advisor/consultant for Haystack Oncology, Amgen, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, BeiGene, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Roche, Takeda and Daiichi-Sankyo and reports funding to their institution from Pfizer, Roche, Grail, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi-Sankyo, Zentalis, AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. Y.W. is a consultant to Belay Diagnostics and Haystack Oncology. J.L. consults for Taiho, Ipsen, Pfizer, Amgen, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis and received research funding from Ipsen, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Foundation Medicine, Bayer, Personalis Inc., Guardant and Agenus. B.V. and K.W.K. are founders of Exact Sciences. K.W.K. and N.P. are advisors to, and hold equity in, Exact Sciences. B.V., K.W.K. and N.P. are founders of, and hold equity in, Clasp Therapeutics and Haystack Oncology, a Quest Diagnostics company. K.W.K., B.V. and N.P. are consultants to, and hold equity in, CAGE Pharma. B.V. is a consultant to, and holds equity in, Catalio Capital Management. C.B. is a consultant to Depuy-Synthes, Bionaut Labs, Haystack Oncology and Galectin Therapeutics. C.B. is also a co-founder of OrisDx and a co-founder of Belay Diagnostics. M.P. is a consultant to Haystack Oncology. L.D. is an employee of Haystack Oncology. The companies named above, as well as other companies, have licensed previously described technologies related to the work described in this paper from Johns Hopkins University. B.V., K.W.K., N.P. and C.B. are inventors on some of these technologies. Licenses to these technologies are or will be associated with equity or royalty payments to the inventors as well as to Johns Hopkins University. Patent applications on the work described in this paper may be filed by Johns Hopkins University. The terms of all these arrangements are being managed by Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. D.B. has received honoraria for consultancies from AstraZeneca, Janssen, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Guardant Health and Amgen and speaking fees from Merck, AstraZeneca and Roche. P.G. is a consultant to Haystack Oncology. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Tie, J. et al. Circulating tumor DNA analysis detects minimal residual disease and predicts recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 346ra392 (2016). - DOI
Grants and funding
- APP1194970/Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
- 178140/Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada)
- 707213/Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (Société Canadienne du Cancer)
- 707213/Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (Société Canadienne du Cancer)
- CA62924, CA009071, GM136577 and CA06973/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | NCI | Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics)
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
