Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Oct 21;41(1):321.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06977-0.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of pediatric cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and safety

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of pediatric cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and safety

Bibhas Amatya et al. Childs Nerv Syst. .

Abstract

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are clusters of dilated, thin-walled vascular channels that pose significant neurological risks, particularly in pediatric patients. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been explored as a non-invasive treatment modality, its safety and efficacy in children remain incompletely defined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of single-arm proportions after SRS for pediatric CCMs. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched; four retrospective cohort studies met inclusion criteria. Random-effects pooled proportions were calculated for key outcomes. Post-SRS seizure proportion (three studies; n = 73) was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.11-0.37; I2 = 23.7%; p = 0.27). A lesion-volume decrease was observed in 0.34 (0.18-0.67; I2 = 82.1%; p = 0.0037). Post-SRS hemorrhage proportion (four studies) was 0.22 (0.09-0.52; I2 = 76.1%; p = 0.0058). Adverse radiation effects (AREs) were uncommon but variably reported. Findings suggest that radiosurgery may provide benefit in selected pediatric CCMs, though small sample sizes and study heterogeneity warrant cautious interpretation.

Keywords: Cavernous malformations; Pediatrics; Radiosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Wang K, Zhou HJ, Wang M (2019) CCM3 and cerebral cavernous malformation disease. Stroke Vasc Neurol 4(2):67–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000195 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Tan H, Zhang L, Mikati AG, Girard R, Khanna O, Fam MD, Liu T, Wang Y, Edelman RR, Christoforidis G, Awad IA (2016) Quantitative susceptibility mapping in cerebral cavernous malformations: clinical correlations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(7):1209–1215. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4724 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Snellings DA, Hong CC, Ren AA, Lopez-Ramirez MA, Girard R, Srinath A, Marchuk DA, Ginsberg MH, Awad IA, Kahn ML (2021) Cerebral cavernous malformation: from mechanism to therapy. Circ Res 129(1):195–215. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318174 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Idiculla PS, Gurala D, Philipose J, Rajdev K, Patibandla P (2020) Cerebral cavernous malformations, developmental venous anomaly, and its coexistence: a review. Eur Neurol 83(4):360–368. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508748 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghali MG, Srinivasan VM, Mohan AC, Jones JY, Kan PT, Lam S (2016) Pediatric cerebral cavernous malformations: Genetics, pathogenesis, and management. Surg Neurol Int 7(Suppl 44):S1127–S1134. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.196921 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources