Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Nov;29(7):e70212.
doi: 10.1111/petr.70212.

Double Versus Single Hepatic Artery Anastomosis in Pediatric Left Liver Grafts: A Reassessment of Outcomes

Carolina Magalhães Costa  1 , Eduardo Antunes Fonseca  1 , Renata Pereira Sustovich Pugliese  1 , Marcel Ruiz Benavides  1 , Karina Moreira de Oliveira Roda  1 , Rodrigo Vincenzi  1 , Nathália Rangel Porto Travassos  1 , Debora Puzzi Fernandes  1 , Gilda Porta  1 , Irene Kazue Miura  1 , Adriana Porta  1 , Vera Baggio Danese  1 , Teng Hsiang Wei  1 , Fernanda do Carmo Iwase  1 , Mônica Lúcia Rodrigues  1 , Aline Falleiro Freitas  1 , Eliene Novais Oliveira  1 , Cristian Barbieri Victoria Borges  1 , João Seda Neto  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Double Versus Single Hepatic Artery Anastomosis in Pediatric Left Liver Grafts: A Reassessment of Outcomes

Carolina Magalhães Costa et al. Pediatr Transplant. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The primary goal of hepatic artery reconstruction is to restore blood flow to the liver graft and its biliary system. Surgical approaches vary in the number of arterial anastomoses, magnification techniques, and anticoagulation strategies. This study analyzes the anatomical approaches used for arterial reconstruction, the incidence of HAT, and associated risk factors.

Method: A retrospective study of 489 primary pediatric LDLT performed between January 2017 and July 2024.

Results: The incidence rates of HAT, early portal vein thrombosis (EPVT), late-PVT, biliary leak (BL), and biliary stricture (BS) were 1% (n = 5), 1.4% (n = 7), 4.3% (n = 21), 15% (n = 73), and 11.9% (n = 58), respectively. Double HA anastomosis was performed in 29.4% (119/405) of cases, with LHA-LHA + MHA-RHA being the most frequent combination. HAT occurred in four patients (1.4%) with single HA anastomosis and one patient (0.8%) in the double HA group (p = 1.00). The rates of BS and BL in the single HA group were 14.7% (n = 51) and 12.1% (n = 42), respectively, compared to 16% (n = 21) and 10.7% (n = 14) in the double HA group (BS: p = 0.72, BL: p = 0.66). Increasing age, CIT, and secondary abdominal closure were associated with higher HAT risk. The overall survival rate was 94.6%, with a median follow-up of 50.7 months (IQR: 21.1-73).

Conclusion: This study showed a low HAT rate (1%) with increasing age, CIT, and secondary abdominal closure as risk factors. Double HA anastomosis did not reduce biliary complications. The most common HA graft-recipient combinations in this study were LHA-RHA for single HA reconstruction and LHA-LHA + MHA-RHA for double HA reconstruction.

Keywords: children; hepatic artery thrombosis; liver transplantation; living donation; outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Six examples of microscopic views illustrating different possibilities for donor graft‐recipient arterial reconstruction. Arrowheads indicate the anastomotic plane. (A) LHA‐RHA anastomosis. (B) LHA‐PHA anastomosis. (C) IMV interposition from the LHA to the PHA. (D) MHA‐RHA + LHA‐LHA anastomosis. (E) MHA‐LHA + LHA‐RHA anastomosis. (F) MHA‐RHA + IMV interposition from the LHA‐LG to the LHA. IMV, inferior mesenteric vein; LHA, left hepatic artery; LHA.LG, LHA from the left gastric artery; MHA, middle hepatic artery; PHA, proper hepatic artery; RHA, right hepatic artery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ikegami T., Kawasaki S., Matsunami H., et al., “Should All Hepatic Arterial Branches Be Reconstructed in Living‐Related Liver Transplantation?,” Surgery 119, no. 4 (1996): 431–436, 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80144-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nickel K. J., Morzycki A., Visser L., Bell E., and Ladak A., “Effect of Magnification in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Pediatric Transplantation 26, no. 3 (2022): e14223, 10.1111/petr.14223. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koh Z. J., Wu A. G., Yew A., et al., “Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of the Outcomes After Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Using a Microscope Versus Surgical Loupe,” Transplantation Proceedings 56, no. 7 (2024): 1585–1592, 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seda‐Neto J., Antunes da Fonseca E., Pugliese R., et al., “Twenty Years of Experience in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Focus on Hepatic Artery Reconstruction, Complications, and Outcomes,” Transplantation 100, no. 5 (2016): 1066–1072, 10.1097/TP.0000000000001135. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neto J. S., Carone E., Pugliese R. P., et al., “Modified Pediatric End‐Stage Liver Disease Scoring System and Pediatric Liver Transplantation in Brazil,” Liver Transplantation 16, no. 4 (2010): 426–430, 10.1002/lt.22000. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types