Experiencing Sepsis: A Meta-Ethnography
- PMID: 41123388
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006913
Experiencing Sepsis: A Meta-Ethnography
Abstract
Objective: To explore and synthesize the adverse and transformative experiences of sepsis survivors and their caregivers, to generate novel, experience-based insights that inform recovery support and future care strategies.
Data sources: Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from 2000 to 2025.
Study selection: Eligible studies included qualitative or mixed-methods research reporting experiences of adult sepsis survivors and/or caregivers. Studies focusing solely on healthcare providers or published in languages other than English were excluded. Nine studies met inclusion criteria.
Data extraction: First- and second-order constructs were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills program. Confidence in findings was evaluated using GRADE-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research, which assesses methodological limitations, coherence, adequacy, and relevance.
Data synthesis: A meta-ethnographic approach guided synthesis, using Noblit and Hare's seven-phase methodology. Five third-order themes emerged for survivors:1. Increased dependency (moderate confidence)2. ICU fog (high confidence)3. Psychological adjustment (moderate confidence)4. Gratitude and guilt in relationships (moderate confidence)5. Post-discharge challenges (moderate confidence)Three themes emerged for caregivers:1. Adapting to caregiving (moderate confidence)2. Uncertainty about the future (moderate confidence)3. Communication challenges (low confidence)Experiences were shaped by both adversity and transformation. Dependency emerged as a central theme influencing autonomy, identity, and engagement with healthcare. Caregivers experienced emotional and logistical strain, often unsupported.
Conclusions: Although deeply personal, sepsis survivorship is marked by consistent themes. Survivor experiences reveal critical insights and generate directions for research and intervention. Findings underscore the need to strengthen survivorship care by prioritizing psychological support, effective communication, and responsive post-discharge services.
Keywords: Sepsis; caregivers; meta-ethnography; patients; qualitative research; quality of life; survivors.
Copyright © 2025 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Haines’ institution received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Dr. Litton received support for article research from the NHMRC Emerging Leadership Grant (2017081) and is a member of the National Critical Care Research Collaboration and the Australian government. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al.: The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:801–810
-
- Oczkowski S, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E, et al.: Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021: Highlights for the practicing clinician. Pol Arch Intern Med 2022; 132:449–458
-
- Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al.: The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1546–1554
-
- Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, et al.: Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet (London) 2018; 392:75–87
-
- Huang CY, Daniels R, Lembo A, et al.; Sepsis Survivors Engagement Project (SSEP): Life after sepsis: An international survey of survivors to understand the post-sepsis syndrome. Int J Qual Health Care 2019; 31:191–198
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
