Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2538759.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.38759.

Perspectives on Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Credentialing and Privileging: A Qualitative Study

Stephanie M Conner  1 , James E Anstey  2 , Meghan K Thomas  3 , Patricia A Carney  2 , Maya D Fiore  4 , Carley E Little  2 , Trevor P Jensen  5 , Kevin M Piro  2
Affiliations

Perspectives on Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Credentialing and Privileging: A Qualitative Study

Stephanie M Conner et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) use is rapidly expanding across several acute care specialties, yet no defined standards currently exist to guide health systems in regulation of POCUS use or clinician best practices.

Objective: To describe existing POCUS credentialing and privileging policy design and implementation in a purposive sample of health care institutions across the US.

Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative study used a cross-sectional, mixed-methods analysis of POCUS policies and procedures conducted between July 23 and October 28, 2024, and was guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) framework. Qualitative analyses used an interpretive phenomenological approach. Participants were POCUS leaders at health care institutions with existing POCUS policies, representing diverse geographic areas, sizes, and practice settings.

Exposures: Thirty-item online survey and 60-minute key informant structured interviews.

Main outcomes and measures: Quantitative survey findings and qualitative analyses of current POCUS policies and practice patterns related to content, implementation, adoption, facilitators, and barriers to use.

Results: Twenty survey and interview participants were included (mean [SD] age, 41.17 [3.79] years; 15 [75.0%] male) and 19 POCUS policies were analyzed. Interviewees reported that successful policy development was influenced by contextual factors (eg, institutional motivators, external forces), policy infrastructure, diverse stakeholder engagement, ability to anticipate and address multilevel barriers, and strategies to maximize policy reach, adoption, and sustainability. Key insights from interviewees highlighted the importance of multidisciplinary POCUS committees and purposeful policy design tailored to align with institutional POCUS practice patterns and values. Leaders stressed the need for careful consideration of policy outcomes and institutional capabilities prior to implementation. While features of policies varied, most delineated specific POCUS applications within the policy and all required institutional training or proctoring from institutional POCUS champions.

Conclusions and relevance: This study identified common themes and barriers in POCUS implementation and strategies used by exemplar institutions to aid other programs in addressing POCUS privileging and establishing standards for safe and effective POCUS use in patient care. The findings suggest POCUS policy development is important for standardizing its use within institutions, guiding training requirements, and establishing oversight procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Conner reported receiving personal fees from the Society of Hospital Medicine for educational materials and services provided and personal fees from the University of California San Francisco for serving as continuing medical education (CME) faculty. Dr Anstey reported receiving personal fees from the Society of Hospital Medicine for educational materials and services provided; personal fees from the University of Texas, San Antonio for serving as CME course faculty; and personal fees from the University of California San Francisco for serving as CME course faculty outside the submitted work. Dr Piro reported receiving nonfinancial support from Exo Imaging Inc for product feedback outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Policy Visualized Through the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) Framework
IT indicates information technology.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Williams JP, Nathanson R, LoPresti CM, et al. Current use, training, and barriers in point-of-care ultrasound in hospital medicine: a national survey of VA hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2022;17(8):601-608. Published online July 17, 2022. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12911 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reaume M, Siuba M, Wagner M, Woodwyk A, Melgar TA. Prevalence and scope of point-of-care ultrasound education in internal medicine, pediatric, and medicine-pediatric residency programs in the United States. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(6):1433-1439. Published online September 26, 2018. doi: 10.1002/jum.14821 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dancel R, Schnobrich D, Puri N, et al. ; Society of Hospital Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force . Recommendations on the use of ultrasound guidance for adult thoracentesis: a position statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(2):126-135. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2940 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cho J, Jensen TP, Reierson K, et al. ; Society of Hospital Medicine Point-of-care Ultrasound Task Force . Recommendations on the use of ultrasound guidance for adult abdominal paracentesis: a position statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019;14:E7-E15. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3095 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franco-Sadud R, Schnobrich D, Mathews BK, et al. ; SHM Point-of-care Ultrasound Task Force . Recommendations on the use of ultrasound guidance for central and peripheral vascular access in adults: a position statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(9):E1-E22. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed