Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;646(8086):831-836.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09527-5. Epub 2025 Oct 22.

Optimization by decoded quantum interferometry

Affiliations

Optimization by decoded quantum interferometry

Stephen P Jordan et al. Nature. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Achieving superpolynomial speed-ups for optimization has long been a central goal for quantum algorithms1. Here we introduce decoded quantum interferometry (DQI), a quantum algorithm that uses the quantum Fourier transform to reduce optimization problems to decoding problems. When approximating optimal polynomial fits over finite fields, DQI achieves a superpolynomial speed-up over known classical algorithms. The speed-up arises because the algebraic structure of the problem is reflected in the decoding problem, which can be solved efficiently. We then investigate whether this approach can achieve a speed-up for optimization problems that lack an algebraic structure but have sparse clauses. These problems reduce to decoding low-density parity-check codes, for which powerful decoders are known2,3. To test this, we construct a max-XORSAT instance for which DQI finds an approximate optimum substantially faster than general-purpose classical heuristics, such as simulated annealing. Although a tailored classical solver can outperform DQI on this instance, our results establish that combining quantum Fourier transforms with powerful decoding primitives provides a promising new path towards quantum speed-ups for hard optimization problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Google has filed a patent application pertaining to the DQI algorithm, on which S.P.J. is the inventor.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of DQI.
As the initial Dicke state is of weight , the final polynomial P is of degree . Here, for simplicity, we take w = 1 and wk = 0 for all k ≠ . Recycling icon adapted from FreeSVG (https://freesvg.org) under a CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain licence.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Illustration of OPI problem.
A stylized example of the OPI problem. For y1Fp, the orange set above the point y1 represents Fy1. Both polynomials Q1(y) and Q2(y) represent solutions that have a large objective value, as they each intersect all but one set Fy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Approximate optima for OPI.
Plot of the expected fraction ⟨s⟩/p of satisfied constraints achieved by DQI with the Berlekamp–Massey decoder and by Prange’s algorithm for the OPI problem in the balanced case r/p = 1/2, as a function of the ratio of variables to constraints n/p. At n/p = 1/10, Prange’s algorithm satisfies a fraction 0.55 of the clauses whereas DQI satisfies s/p=1/2+19/200.7179. As a concrete challenge to the classical algorithms community, we propose matching or exceeding this value in polynomial time. In our concrete resource estimation, we consider n/p = 1/2, where OPI achieves s/p=1/2+3/40.9330 and Prange’s algorithm achieves 0.75. BM, Berlekamp–Massey decoder.

References

    1. Abbas, A. et al. Challenges and opportunities in quantum optimization. Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 718–735 (2024).
    1. Gallager, R. G. Low-Density Parity-Check Codes (MIT, 1963).
    1. Richardson, T. J. & Urbanke, R. L. The capacity of low-density parity-check codes under message-passing decoding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory47, 599–618 (2001).
    1. Trevisan, L. in Paradigms of Combinatorial Optimization: Problems and New Approaches 2nd edn (ed. Paschos, V. Th.) Ch. 13 (Wiley, 2014).
    1. Ajtai, M., Kumar, R. & Sivakumar, D. A sieve algorithm for the shortest lattice vector problem. In Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 601–610 (ACM, 2001).

LinkOut - more resources