Gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence rate and risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 41130422
- DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112949
Gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence rate and risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) confers significant short- and long-term metabolic risks. Shifting fertility patterns have amplified concerns about GDM recurrence, but significant heterogeneity in the evidence hinders evidence-based counseling and obscures modifiable predictor identification. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching nine electronic databases and identified 30 studies involving 30,524 women, of whom 13,610 experienced recurrence. The pooled recurrence rate was 50.7 % (95 % CI 46.6-55.2), with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 97.7 %, P < 0.001, range: 30.87-73.75 %) principally driven by diagnostic criteria differences. Ten significant risk factors were identified across maternal, obesity-related, and metabolic domains. Advanced maternal age (subsequent pregnancy ≥ 35 years: OR = 3.408, 95 % CI 2.591-4.482) and prepregnancy obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 in index pregnancy: OR = 3.248, 95 % CI 1.838-5.742; BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 in subsequent pregnancy: OR = 2.273, 95 % CI 1.463-3.530) were top predictors. Prior macrosomia (OR = 2.064, 95 % CI 1.820-2.341), index-pregnancy insulin therapy (OR = 2.353, 95 % CI 1.351-4.098) and early subsequent-pregnancy hyperglycemia (OR = 2.665, 95 % CI 2.022-3.513), hypertriglyceridemia (OR = 2.022, 95 % CI 1.548-2.641) significantly increased risk. Risk-stratified prevention must integrate initial diagnostic criteria with patient-specific factors.
Keywords: , Systematic review; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Meta-analysis; Recurrence; Risk factors.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
