Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 25.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03616-w. Online ahead of print.

Assessing observer-dependent dental age estimation procedures: intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well established radiographic systems for dental analysis

Affiliations

Assessing observer-dependent dental age estimation procedures: intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well established radiographic systems for dental analysis

Nikolaos Angelakopoulos et al. Int J Legal Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

In forensic contexts, age assessments constitute matters of substantial legal consequence, particularly in proceedings involving children and young adolescents. Dental age estimation (DAE) techniques are widely used for this purpose, especially in cases involving undocumented minors. This study assesses intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well established radiographic systems for dental analysis.: Gleiser and Hunt Modified by Köhler (GHK), Demirjian (DEM), Kullman (KUL), and Cameriere's Third Molar Maturity Index (I3M). A total of 50 panoramic radiographs from individuals aged 14-23.99 years were analyzed by nine qualified forensic experts. The observers assessed the development stages of third molars using the three staging methods (GHK, DEM, KUL) and measured the I3M using Cameriere's metric approach. Primarily, the quantitative assessment for analyzing the agreement was Cohen's Kappa, Gwet's Agreement Coefficient (AC1) and (AC2), and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Statistical analysis revealed high intra-observer reliability for all methods, with coefficient values indicating strong agreement among individual observers. In terms of inter-observer reliability, the I3M achieved the highest agreement (ICC 0.986), followed by DEM (AC2 0.918), GHK (AC2 0.914), and KUL (AC2 0.868). Notably, maxillary third molars consistently showed lower inter-observer agreement than mandibular third molars, particularly when assessed using the DEM and GHK methods. The highest inter-observer agreement in cases where a tooth could not be staged or measured was observed for the KUL method (AC1 0.993), followed by I3M (AC1 0.988), with DEM and GHK, demonstrating equivalent levels of agreement (AC1 0.954). All of the tested methods yielded highly reliable results, especially DEM and GHK. The choice of a staging method should be guided by the specific objectives of each study. Moreover, while the I3M method demonstrated high reliability values, obtaining identical repeated measurements was nearly impossible due to its metric approach.

Keywords: Dental age estimation; Forensic odontology; Panoramic radiographs; Reliability; Third molar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: Not applicable. The study used fully anonymized, retrospectively collected data from an existing dataset with no direct involvement of human participants. Informed consent: Not applicable. Compliance with ethical standards: The study was carried out following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki (Finland). Human ethics and consent to participate: Not applicable Research involving human participants and/or animals: Not applicable. Clinical trial number: Not applicable Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. Adserias-Garriga J (2019) Age estimation: a multidisciplinary approach. Academic, London
    1. Rudolphi F, Steffens L, Shay D et al (2024) Insights into dental age estimation: introducing multiple regression data from a black South African population on modified gustafson’s criteria. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03312-1 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L et al (2009) The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int 193:1–13 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eikvil L, Kvaal SI, Teigland A et al (2012) Age Estimation in youths and young adults: a summary of the needs for methodological research and development. Nor Comput Cent, SAMBA 52/12:1–26
    1. Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IOB, Solheim T (1995) Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 74:175–185 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources