Prediction Model for Etiologic Differentiation of Isolated Vestibular Syndrome in Emergency Settings
- PMID: 41137463
- DOI: 10.1002/acn3.70213
Prediction Model for Etiologic Differentiation of Isolated Vestibular Syndrome in Emergency Settings
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for differentiating central from peripheral etiologies in patients with isolated vestibular syndrome (VS).
Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 506 patients with isolated VS from five hospitals were divided into derivation (n = 301) and validation (n = 205) cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine independent predictors of central VS. These predictors were assigned weights to construct the SAV3E score. The performance of the SAV3E was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) and compared with that of the TriAGe+ and STANDING models.
Results: The SAV3E score incorporated five predictors: absence of vestibular vagal symptoms (OR, 0.233; 95% CI, 0.084-0.648; p = 0.005), prior stroke (OR, 15.204; 95% CI, 4.455-51.884; p < 0.001), ABCD2 score of 4-7 (OR, 1.903; 95% CI, 1.206-3.004; p = 0.006), central video oculography nystagmus (OR, 38.377; 95% CI, 8.631-170.644; p < 0.001), and positive video head impulse test (OR, 0.078; 95% CI, 0.033-0.188; p < 0.001). It displayed good discriminative performance with AUCs 0.910 and 0.886 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. It outperformed TriAGe+ (AUC: 0.706) and STANDING (AUC: 0.779) models. Furthermore, calibration analysis revealed good model fit across cohorts (Hosmer-Lemeshow test results: derivation cohort, p = 0.899; validation cohort, p = 0.789). DCA confirmed good clinical utility across a wide range of probability thresholds (derivation cohort: 0.01-0.86, validation cohort: 0.01-1.00).
Conclusion: The SAV3E score is a validated tool aimed at differentiating central versus peripheral VS, with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy for urgent etiologies such as stroke.
Keywords: acute vestibular syndrome; etiology; predictive model.
© 2025 The Author(s). Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
References
-
- C. Gerlier, M. Hoarau, A. Fels, et al., “Differentiating Central From Peripheral Causes of Acute Vertigo in an Emergency Setting With the Hints, Standing, and ABCD2 Tests: A Diagnostic Cohort Study,” Academic Emergency Medicine 28 (2021): 1368–1378.
-
- A. A. Tarnutzer, A. L. Berkowitz, K. A. Robinson, Y. H. Hsieh, and D. E. Newman‐Toker, “Does My Dizzy Patient Have a Stroke? A Systematic Review of Bedside Diagnosis in Acute Vestibular Syndrome,” CMAJ 183 (2011): E571–E592.
-
- A. S. Saber Tehrani, J. C. Kattah, G. Mantokoudis, et al., “Small Strokes Causing Severe Vertigo: Frequency of False‐Negative MRIs and Nonlacunar Mechanisms,” Neurology 83 (2014): 169–173.
-
- J. A. Chalela, C. S. Kidwell, L. M. Nentwich, et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in Emergency Assessment of Patients With Suspected Acute Stroke: A Prospective Comparison,” Lancet 369 (2007): 293–298.
-
- V. P. Shah, J. E. S. L. Oliveira, W. Farah, et al., “Diagnostic Accuracy of Neuroimaging in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Vertigo or Dizziness: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis for the Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department,” Academic Emergency Medicine 30 (2023): 517–530.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
