Comparative analysis of risk prediction scores including all types of cancer-associated thrombosis
- PMID: 41139366
- DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04099-2
Comparative analysis of risk prediction scores including all types of cancer-associated thrombosis
Abstract
Background: Classically, risk assessment models have focused on classic, clinically symptomatic thrombotic events, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), not taking into account incidental thrombosis or non-conventional thrombotic events such as catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) or splenic vein thrombosis (SVT), although they contribute to morbidity and increase the consumption of health resources.
Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of the Khorana, PROTECHT, CONKO, modified VIENA-CATS (excluding P-selectin values), and MICA-CATS scores in assessing all type of thrombotic events in cancer patients (p) in the second cohort of the observational, multicenter, prospective ONCOTHROMB12-01 study. Data from 391 patients undergoing ambulatory systemic therapy across 11 Spanish hospitals between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed.
Results: 95 patients (24.3%) developed a thrombotic event. MICA-CATS score showed the best predictive capacity for all thrombotic events, as assessed by both the AUROC and the AUPRC, with an AUROC of 0.61 (95% CI 0.54-0.67) and an AUPRC of 0.38 (95% CI 0.30-0.46). For incidental thrombotic events, both the PROTECHT (0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.68) and MICA-CATS (0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.68) scores demonstrated utility.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that MICA-CATS score has the best predictive capacity for overall venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients.
Keywords: Cancer-associated thrombosis; D-dimer; Incidental events; Risk assessment model; Venous thromboembolism.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: Irene González Caraballo: Travel, accommodations, expenses: MSD, Rovi, Gilead, Rizmoic. Andrés Jesús Muñoz Martín: consultant or advisory role: GSK, Pfizer, BMS-Celgene, Sanofi, Astra-Zeneca, MSD, Lilly, Servier, Roche, Taiho, Leo Pharma, Regeneron. Research funding: Leo Pharma, Sanofi, BMS-Celgene. Speakers’ bureau: Rovi, Menarini, Stada, Medscape. Patents, royalties, other intellectual property: risk assessment model in venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Liquid biopsy developed with laser technology. The rest of the authors declare no conflicts of interest for the present article.
References
-
- De BS. l’obliteration des veines et de son influence sur la formation des hydropisies partielles: consideration sur la hydropisies passive et général. Arch Gen Med. 1823;1:188–204.
-
- Trousseau A. Phlegmasia alba dolens. In: Clinique médicale de l’hôtel-dieu de paris. 2nd ed. Paris: The Sydenham Society; 1865. p. 654–712.
-
- Koizume S, Miyagi Y. Tissue factor in cancer-associated thromboembolism. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01968-3 . - DOI
-
- Grignani G, Maiolo A. Cytokines and hemostasis. Haematologica. 2000;85(9):967–72. - PubMed
-
- Mahajan A, Brunson A, Adesina O, Keegan THM, Wun T. The incidence of cancer-associated thrombosis is increasing over time. Blood Adv. 2022;6:307–20. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005590 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
