Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Oct 25;28(10):1161-1178.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250724-00280.

[Safety and efficacy of endoscopic and surgical anti-reflux procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

[Safety and efficacy of endoscopic and surgical anti-reflux procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]

[Article in Chinese]
H T Lin et al. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus surgical treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: Randomized controlled trials were identified through systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI. Both direct effect models and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis were used to compare treatments directly and indirectly. The following types of studies were included : (1) RCTs involving endoscopic or surgical treatment for adult GERD patients aged ≥18 years with no previous history of gastroesophageal surgery; (2) studies comparing two or more treatment methods, including different endoscopic or surgical procedures, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and/or sham surgery; and (3) articles published in Chinese or English. Review articles and conference abstracts were excluded. Results: A total of 47 randomized controlled trials were enrolled, and 43 studies were network meta-analyzed. Both endoscopic and surgical treatments significantly reduced postoperative PPI use compared to PPI therapy (P <0.05). Among all treatment modalities, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF, SUCRA=0.84) demonstrated the highest efficacy, followed by laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF, SUCRA=0.71) and anterior partial fundoplication (APF, SUCRA=0.70). Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) demonstrated the best outcomes in relieving heartburn (SUCRA=0.87) and bloating (SUCRA=0.86) symptoms. The overall safety of surgical treatment was comparable to that of PPI therapy. However, LNF was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia and gas-related symptoms, whereas TIF had a lower risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Both endoscopic and surgical treatments are effective for GERD. LNF provides the highest rate of medication discontinuation but carries a higher risk of postoperative complications. TIF offers better relief of heartburn and bloating with fewer complications.

目的: 通过系统评价和网状Meta分析,综合比较内镜与外科手术治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的疗效及安全性。 方法: 系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science及中国知网数据库,纳入符合下述标准的随机对照研究(RCT):(1)针对研究对象为年龄≥18岁,无既往胃食管手术史的成年GERD患者进行内镜或外科手术治疗的随机对照试验;(2)比较两种或两种以上治疗方法的研究:不同内镜下或外科手术术式、PPI和(或)假手术治疗;(3)文章语言为中文或英文。本研究不纳入综述和会议摘要类型的文章。采用直接效应模型及贝叶斯随机效应模型进行直接和间接比较。 结果: 本研究检索纳入47项RCT,其中43篇文献被纳入网状研究。内镜及外科手术在减少术后质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用方面均显著优于PPI治疗(P<0.05),腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术(LNF)疗效最佳(SUCRA值=0.84),其次是腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术(LTF)(SUCRA值=0.71)、前部部分胃底折叠术(APF)(SUCRA值=0.70)。经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)在缓解烧心(SUCRA值=0.87)和腹胀症状方面疗效最优(SUCRA值=0.86)。手术治疗的安全性总体与PPI治疗相当,LNF术后吞咽困难和排气增加的发生率较高,TIF术后并发症风险较低。 结论: 内镜与外科手术均为治疗GERD的有效手段,LNF在术后停用PPI方面效果最好,但需要注意术后并发症的发生。而TIF在缓解烧心、腹胀症状具有一定优势,且术后并发症发生率较低。.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances