[Safety and efficacy of endoscopic and surgical anti-reflux procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]
- PMID: 41139639
- DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250724-00280
[Safety and efficacy of endoscopic and surgical anti-reflux procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus surgical treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: Randomized controlled trials were identified through systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI. Both direct effect models and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis were used to compare treatments directly and indirectly. The following types of studies were included : (1) RCTs involving endoscopic or surgical treatment for adult GERD patients aged ≥18 years with no previous history of gastroesophageal surgery; (2) studies comparing two or more treatment methods, including different endoscopic or surgical procedures, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and/or sham surgery; and (3) articles published in Chinese or English. Review articles and conference abstracts were excluded. Results: A total of 47 randomized controlled trials were enrolled, and 43 studies were network meta-analyzed. Both endoscopic and surgical treatments significantly reduced postoperative PPI use compared to PPI therapy (P <0.05). Among all treatment modalities, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF, SUCRA=0.84) demonstrated the highest efficacy, followed by laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF, SUCRA=0.71) and anterior partial fundoplication (APF, SUCRA=0.70). Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) demonstrated the best outcomes in relieving heartburn (SUCRA=0.87) and bloating (SUCRA=0.86) symptoms. The overall safety of surgical treatment was comparable to that of PPI therapy. However, LNF was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia and gas-related symptoms, whereas TIF had a lower risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Both endoscopic and surgical treatments are effective for GERD. LNF provides the highest rate of medication discontinuation but carries a higher risk of postoperative complications. TIF offers better relief of heartburn and bloating with fewer complications.
目的: 通过系统评价和网状Meta分析,综合比较内镜与外科手术治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的疗效及安全性。 方法: 系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science及中国知网数据库,纳入符合下述标准的随机对照研究(RCT):(1)针对研究对象为年龄≥18岁,无既往胃食管手术史的成年GERD患者进行内镜或外科手术治疗的随机对照试验;(2)比较两种或两种以上治疗方法的研究:不同内镜下或外科手术术式、PPI和(或)假手术治疗;(3)文章语言为中文或英文。本研究不纳入综述和会议摘要类型的文章。采用直接效应模型及贝叶斯随机效应模型进行直接和间接比较。 结果: 本研究检索纳入47项RCT,其中43篇文献被纳入网状研究。内镜及外科手术在减少术后质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用方面均显著优于PPI治疗(P<0.05),腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术(LNF)疗效最佳(SUCRA值=0.84),其次是腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术(LTF)(SUCRA值=0.71)、前部部分胃底折叠术(APF)(SUCRA值=0.70)。经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)在缓解烧心(SUCRA值=0.87)和腹胀症状方面疗效最优(SUCRA值=0.86)。手术治疗的安全性总体与PPI治疗相当,LNF术后吞咽困难和排气增加的发生率较高,TIF术后并发症风险较低。 结论: 内镜与外科手术均为治疗GERD的有效手段,LNF在术后停用PPI方面效果最好,但需要注意术后并发症的发生。而TIF在缓解烧心、腹胀症状具有一定优势,且术后并发症发生率较低。.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
