[Feasibility study of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after transvenous lead extraction]
- PMID: 41139650
- DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250828-00610
[Feasibility study of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after transvenous lead extraction]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical feasibility of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation following transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: This was a retrospective study. Consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at Peking University People's Hospital between June 2015 and October 2023 were enrolled. Patients were divided into the TLE group and the newly implanted group based on whether they received TLE prior to S-ICD implantation. Baseline characteristics, S-ICD indication, defibrillation threshold test results, complications, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 27 patients were included, aged (49.2±14.2) years, including 19 males. There were 12 patients in the TLE group and 15 in the newly implanted group. Compared with the TLE group, patients in the newly implanted group were younger ((43.3±13.7) years vs. (55.6±12.0) years, P=0.013). The main S-ICD indication in the TLE group was high infection risk (9/12), whereas in the newly implanted group it was younger age (11/15). All patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation, with 18 patients completing defibrillation threshold testing (all successful). Additionally, the TLE group had longer follow-up duration than the newly implanted group (42 (19, 60) months vs. 12 (3, 28) months, P=0.001). No complications or deaths occurred during follow-up, with normal device function in both groups. A total of 17 ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation events were recorded, of which 7 met defibrillation criteria and all received effective therapy. Conclusion: S-ICD demonstrates safety and efficacy as a therapeutic option for patients after TLE, with comparable device functionality and follow-up outcomes to patients with newly implanted S-ICD.
目的: 评估经静脉导线拔除(TLE)术后植入全皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)的临床可行性。 方法: 本研究为回顾性研究。连续纳入2015年6月—2023年10月于北京大学人民医院植入S-ICD的患者,根据S-ICD植入前是否接受TLE术将入选患者分为TLE组和新植入组,收集并比较2组患者的基线特征、S-ICD适应证、除颤阈值测试结果、并发症及术后随访情况。 结果: 共纳入27例患者,年龄(49.2±14.2)岁,男性19例。TLE组12例,新植入组15例。与TLE组相比,新植入组患者的年龄更小[(43.3±13.7)岁比(55.6±12.0)岁,P=0.013]。TLE组患者S-ICD的主要适应证为感染高风险(9/12),而新植入组的主要适应证为年轻(11/15)。所有患者S-ICD植入手术成功,共18例患者进行除颤阈值测试(全部成功)。此外,TLE组随访时间较新植入组长[42(19,60)个月比12(3,28)个月,P=0.001]。随访期间无并发症或死亡发生,2组患者的设备功能均正常,共记录17次室性心动过速或心室颤动事件,其中7次达到除颤治疗标准且全部获得有效除颤治疗。 结论: S-ICD对于TLE术后患者是一种安全且有效的治疗方案,其装置功能和术后随访结果与新植入S-ICD患者相比具有一致性。.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
