Extraction site hernia and short-term outcomes following intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic and laparoscopic right colectomy: a multi-center prospective trial
- PMID: 41145697
- PMCID: PMC12823757
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-12327-7
Extraction site hernia and short-term outcomes following intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic and laparoscopic right colectomy: a multi-center prospective trial
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown outcomes advantages of intracorporeal compared to extracorporeal anastomosis during minimally invasive right colectomy that include less conversion to open, faster return of bowel function, and shorter hospital length of stay. The extracorporeal anastomosis and specimen extraction incision are often midline and may be associated with incisional hernias. The study aim was to determine if intracorporeal right colectomy is associated with fewer incisional hernias.
Methods: This is the final data analysis for the ANastomotic COmparison in Right Colectomy (ANCOR) prospective multi-center study designed to compare laparoscopic- or robotic-assisted intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomoses in patients undergoing minimally invasive right colectomy for benign or malignant neoplasia. The primary outcome was the extraction site incisional hernia rate at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and short-term complications. Descriptive statistics [mean with standard deviation and median with interquartile range (IQR)] were applied using SAS 9.4.
Results: 150 patients (30 laparoscopic and 120 robotic assisted) underwent intracorporeal anastomosis, and 150 patients (120 laparoscopic and 30 robotic assisted) underwent extracorporeal anastomosis. All extracorporeal specimen extraction sites were midline. Intracorporeal extraction sites were off-midline in 98.7%. At 2 years, extraction site hernias were significantly more common in the extracorporeal group (10.1% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.013), with only one hernia repaired in the intracorporeal group. The intracorporeal group had significantly fewer conversions to open (0% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.0001), shorter extraction site incisions (4.9 cm vs. 6.0 cm, p < 0.0001), shorter time to gastrointestinal recovery, shorter time to tolerating diet, shorter hospital length of stay (3.0 vs. 4.0 days, p < 0.0001), and longer operative times (207.5 min vs. 173.1 min, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between groups in postoperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes.
Conclusion: Intracorporeal anastomosis during minimally invasive right colectomy is associated with a lower rate of incisional hernias and other benefits compared to the extracorporeal approach. These data support continued training in and implementation of intracorporeal anastomotic techniques.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03312569.
Keywords: Extracorporeal anastomosis; Intracorporeal anastomosis; Laparoscopic right colectomy; Minimally invasive colorectal surgery; Robotic-assisted right colectomy.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Disclosures: Robert K. Cleary has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. for educational speaking. James McCormick reports personal fees from Intuitive Surgical, outside the submitted work. Patricia Sylla reports personal fees from Ethicon, Medtronic, Stryker, Activ Surgical, Safeheal, and Boehringer, outside the submitted work. Jamie Cannon is on the speaker’s bureau for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Wolfgang Gaertner reports personal fees from Intuitive Surgical and personal fees from Coloplast, outside the submitted work. Amir L. Bastawrous reports personal fees from Intuitive Surgical outside the submitted work. Vincent Obias is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Medrobotic, and Noah Medical. Alessio Pigazzi reports royalties from Xodus and consulting fees from Medtronic and Ethicon outside the submitted work. Authors Robert K. Cleary, Matthew Silviera, Tobi J. Reidy, James McCormick, Craig S. Johnson, Patricia Sylla, Jamie Cannon, Henry Lujan, Andrew Kassir, Ron G. Landmann, Wolfgang Gaertner, Edward Lee, Amir L. Bastawrous, Ovunc Bardakcioglu, Sushil Pandey, Vikram Attaluri, Mitchell Bernstein, Vincent Obias, and Alessio Pigazzi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
