Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Oct 7;13(10):2444.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13102444.

Preclinical Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes: Reality or Utopia

Affiliations
Review

Preclinical Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes: Reality or Utopia

Tatyana A Marakhovskaya et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic β-cells, predominantly manifesting in childhood or adolescence. The lack of clearly interpretable biological markers in the early stages, combined with the insidious onset of the disease, poses significant challenges to early diagnosis and the implementation of preventive strategies. The applicability of classic T1D biomarkers for understanding the mechanisms of the autoimmune process, preclinical diagnostics and treatment efficiency is limited. Despite advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, which have enabled large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and the identification of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) associated with T1D predisposition, as well as progress in bioinformatics approaches for assessing dysregulated gene expression, no universally accepted risk assessment model or definitive predictive biomarker has been established. Until now, the use of new promising biomarkers for T1D diagnostics is limited by insufficient evidence base. However, they have great potential for the development of diagnostic methods on their basis, which has been shown in single or serial large-scale studies. This critical review covers both well-known biomarkers widely used in clinical practice, such as HLA-haplotype, non-HLA SNPs, islet antigen autoantibodies, C-peptide, and the promising ones, such as cytokines, cfDNA, microRNA, T1D-specific immune cells, islet-TCR, and T1D-specific vibrational bands. Additionally, we highlight new approaches that have been gaining popularity and have already demonstrated their potential: GWAS, single-cell transcriptomics, identification of antigen-specific T cells using scRNA-seq, and FTIR spectroscopy. Although some of the biomarkers, in our opinion, are still limited to a research context or are far from being implemented in clinical diagnostics of T1D, they have the greatest potential of being applied in clinical practice. When integrated with the monitoring of the classical autoimmune diabetes markers, they would increase the sensitivity and specificity during diagnostics of early and preclinical stages of the disease. This critical review aims to evaluate the current landscape of classical and emerging biomarkers in autoimmune diabetes, with a focus on those enabling early detection-prior to extensive destruction of pancreatic islets. Another goal of the review is to focus the attention of the scientific community on the gaps in early T1D diagnostics, and to help in the selection of markers, targets, and methods for scientific studies on creating novel diagnostic panels.

Keywords: C-peptide; FTIR spectroscopy; GWAS; HLA-haplotype; T1D specific vibrational bands; T1D-specific immune cells; cfDNA; cytokines; islet antigens autoantibodies; islet-TCR; microRNA; non-HLA SNPs; prediabetes; scRNA-seq; type 1 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methods for T1D diagnosing genetic predisposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
New approaches and methods in T1D detection and development of diagnostic markers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
T1D marker representation at different stages of the disease.

References

    1. Gregory G.A., Robinson T.I., Linklater S.E., Wang F., Colagiuri S., de Beaufort C., Donaghue K.C., Harding J.L., Wander P.L., Zhang X., et al. Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: A modelling study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10:741–760. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00218-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr A.L.J., Evans-Molina C., Oram R.A. Precision medicine in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2022;67:1854–1866. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05778-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma˘nescu M., Ma˘nescu I.B., Grama A. A review of stage 0 biomarkers in type 1 diabetes: The holy grail of early detection and prevention? J. Pers. Med. 2024;14:878. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080878. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Besser R.E., Bell K.J., Couper J.J., Ziegler A.G., Wherrett D.K., Knip M., Speake C., Casteels K., Driscoll K.A., Jacobsen L., et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Stages of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022;23:1–13. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13410. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parviainen A., Härkönen T., Ilonen J., But A., Knip M., Register F.P.D. Heterogeneity of type 1 diabetes at diagnosis supports existence of age-related endotypes. Diabetes Care. 2022;45:871–879. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1251. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources