Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Oct 15;61(10):1849.
doi: 10.3390/medicina61101849.

Comparative Outcomes of Delayed i-PRF Combination with Nanofracture in the Treatment of Large Chondral Defects in the Knee

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative Outcomes of Delayed i-PRF Combination with Nanofracture in the Treatment of Large Chondral Defects in the Knee

Özgür Başal et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether delayed intra-articular application of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) improves clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to nanofracture alone. Materials and Methods: A total of 76 patients with ICRS Grade III-IV femoral condyle or trochlear cartilage defects larger than 2 cm2 were enrolled in this prospective controlled study. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group 1 (n = 40) underwent nanofracture followed by delayed intra-articular i-PRF injection at three weeks postoperatively, while Group 2 (n = 36) underwent nanofracture alone. Preoperative MRI was evaluated using the AMADEUS grading system. Clinical outcomes-including WOMAC and IKDC scores-were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. MOCART 2.0 scoring was used to evaluate cartilage repair at ≥12 months follow-up. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant functional improvement according to the IKDC and WOMAC scores. However, Group 1 showed a significantly greater improvement in WOMAC total score at final follow-up (Group 1: 20.1 ± 4.3 vs. control: 23.2 ± 3.4; p = 0.0008). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in IKDC score (p = 0.238), Tegner score (p = 0.776), or time to return to daily activities (p = 0.401). Baseline demographic, radiological, and intraoperative variables were comparable between groups (p > 0.05 for all). Radiologic outcomes based on the mean MOCART 2.0 scores were 57.1 and 50, respectively, in group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.0316). These results showed significantly improved results in group 1 according to the MRI evaluation. Conclusions: In patients with large chondral defects (>2 cm2), delayed intra-articular i-PRF injection following nanofracture may improve mid-term functional and radiological outcomes, particularly in pain and symptom relief. This regenerative strategy enhances cartilage repair potential during the early healing phase without adding surgical complexity.

Keywords: AMADEUS; MOCART 2.0; bone marrow stimulation; cartilage regeneration; chondral defect; injectable PRF; nanofracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Arthroscopic images of a Grade IV chondral lesion located on the femoral trochlea of a 42-year-old male patient presenting with chronic anterior knee pain. A ring curette was used to debride unstable cartilage in order to create stable vertical margins. (B) The surface after the calcified cartilage layer has been removed. (A,C) nanofracture awl was used to induce controlled perforations that allowed access to the subchondral bone marrow. (D) Successful subchondral access and marrow stimulation are confirmed by the visible effusion of marrow elements from nanofracture sites.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The WOMAC total scores for both treatment groups pre- and postoperative at 6th 12th and 24th months. Although both groups showed improvement after surgery, Group 1 (i-PRF + nanofracture) consistently had lower (better) WOMAC scores, particularly at 12 and 24 months.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The IKDC scores obtained preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months are shown in the graphical abstract.

References

    1. Zedde P., Cudoni S., Giachetti G., Manunta M.L., Masala G., Brunetti A., Manunta A.F. Subchondral bone remodeling: Comparing nanofracture with microfracture. An ovine in vivo study. Joints. 2016;4:87–93. doi: 10.11138/jts/2016.4.2.087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solheim E., Hegna J., Inderhaug E. Long-Term Survival after Microfracture and Mosaicplasty for Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: A Comparative Study Between Two Treatments Cohorts. Cartilage. 2020;11:71–76. doi: 10.1177/1947603518783482. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gobbi A., Karnatzikos G., Kumar A. Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014;22:1986–1996. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2676-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ossendorff R., Franke K., Erdle B., Uhl M., Südkamp N.P., Salzmann G.M. Clinical and radiographical ten years long-term outcome of microfracture vs. autologous chondrocyte implantation: A matched-pair analysis. Int. Orthop. 2019;43:553–559. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4025-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abd El Raouf M., Wang X., Miusi S., Chai J., Mohamed AbdEl-Aal A.B., Nefissa Helmy M.M., Ghanaati S., Choukroun J., Choukroun E., Zhang Y., et al. Injectable-platelet rich fibrin using the low speed centrifugation concept improves cartilage regeneration when compared to platelet-rich plasma. Platelets. 2019;30:213–221. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2017.1401058. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources