Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 29:102110.
doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102110. Online ahead of print.

MRI imaging and machine learning based radiomics for detection of mixed HCC and CCA tumors

Affiliations
Free article

MRI imaging and machine learning based radiomics for detection of mixed HCC and CCA tumors

Yuquan Qian et al. Ann Hepatol. .
Free article

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Primary liver cancer (PLC), comprising hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), is a leading cause of cancer mortality globally. The combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCCCC) subtype may be less common but is relevant to treatment efficacy. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of various approaches in distinguishing these liver cancers.

Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with HCC, CCA, and cHCCCC at Beijing University Cancer Hospital and Institute, China were included. Radiologists of varying expertise independently assessed MRI scans, and we measured their diagnostic consistency. Radiomic features were extracted from MRI scans, and machine learning was applied to differentiate the cancer types.

Results: Standard imaging was insufficient to reliably characterize cHCCCC. Abdominal imaging experts (AIEs) had a higher mean sensitivity for HCC and CCA, 88% and 84% respectively, while non-experts (NIEs) had a lower sensitivity of 50% for HCC and 38% for CCA (HCC: p = 0.03, CCA: p = 0.008). Radiomic analysis found 'Sphericity' and 'ClusterShade' as the most relevant features. However, radiomics algorithms were also not sufficient to distinguish cHCCCC from either HCC or CCA. Regarding sensitivity, the radiomic-based model was not better than radiologists for any of the three classes (p = 0.065 for HCC, p = 0.426 for CCA, and p = 1.0 for cHCCCC). The random forest algorithm yielded an accuracy of 76% in the test set, since it correctly classified most HCC and CCA, while only one quarter of cHCCCC tumors.

Conclusions: Histopathological analysis, complemented by imaging as indicated, remains essential for accurate detection, diagnosis, and treatment of liver cancers.

Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; Liver cancer; Machine learning models; Radiomics;MRI scans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests None.

LinkOut - more resources