Sodium Channel Inhibitors in Clinical Development for Pain Management: A Focused Review
- PMID: 41182481
- DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01244-x
Sodium Channel Inhibitors in Clinical Development for Pain Management: A Focused Review
Abstract
Chronic and neuropathic pain remain significant clinical challenges owing to limited efficacy and safety concerns associated with conventional analgesics, including opioids and NSAIDs. Voltage-gated sodium channels, particularly Nav1.7 and Nav1.8, have emerged as promising non-opioid targets for pain modulation, given their selective expression in peripheral nociceptors and critical roles in pain signal transmission. Recent advances in structural biology and pharmacology have enabled the development of highly selective inhibitors targeting these channels. This review explores sodium channel inhibitors currently in clinical development, with a focus on suzetrigine (VX-548), the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved Nav1.8 inhibitor for acute pain, as well as other investigational agents such as ralfinamide, OLP-1002, LTGO-33 and HBW-004285. Despite setbacks in early candidates owing to selectivity and tolerability issues, ongoing trials demonstrate renewed optimism for a new class of analgesics that may overcome the limitations of traditional pain therapies. We discuss key pharmacological challenges observed in earlier trials including functional redundancy, species differences, and on-target side effects, and outline how emerging strategies, such as structural biology-guided design, combination therapies, and precision medicine, are paving the way for safer, more effective, nonaddictive pain treatments.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: C.B., A.S., and N.N.K. declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Consent (participation and publication): Not applicable Data availability statement: Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Code availability: Not applicable Author contributions: Conceptualization, N.N.K., C.B., and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S. and C.B.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and C.B.; visualization, C.B. and A.S.; supervision, N.N.K.; project administration, N.N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
-
- Castroman P, Quiroga O, Mayoral Rojals V, et al. Reimagining how we treat acute pain: a narrative review. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e23992. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23992 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Scholz J, Finnerup NB, Attal N, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic neuropathic pain. Pain. 2019;160(1):53–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001365 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Colloca L, Ludman T, Bouhassira D, et al. Neuropathic pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.2 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Gordon DB. Acute pain assessment tools: let us move beyond simple pain ratings. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(5):565–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000225 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Thouaye M, Yalcin I. Neuropathic pain: from actual pharmacological treatments to new therapeutic horizons. Pharmacol Ther. 2023;251:108546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108546 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
