EXPRESS-PrEP: Evaluating PrEP Rapid Engagement and Same-Day Start for HIV Prevention in gbMSM
- PMID: 41183654
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108166
EXPRESS-PrEP: Evaluating PrEP Rapid Engagement and Same-Day Start for HIV Prevention in gbMSM
Abstract
Objectives: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) and transgender women (TGW) remain disproportionately affected by HIV in Canada, yet uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is suboptimal. Multi-step clinical pathways and laboratory delays contribute to initiation attrition. This study evaluated the impact of a same-day PrEP initiation model using tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) in a Canadian clinic.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-site observational cohort at HQ Health Hub in Toronto. Individuals ≥16 years presenting for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) testing or treatment were screened for PrEP eligibility using a modified HIV Incidence Risk Index (HIRI) score (≥10) or PrEP request. Eligible participants were offered same-day initiation following testing and returned within 24 hours.
Results: Of 1766 individuals offered PrEP, 1204 accepted (67.7%), 888 were screened, and 814 (91.7%) initiated within 24 hours. Median age of 31 years (26-34), 67% were non-white, and 94% cis-men. Retention from referred individuals was 66.7% at 6 months and 58.0% at 12 months. Compared to historical norms, more participants remained in care of those referred at 6 months (66.7% vs. 31.5%, p<0.001). No serious renal adverse events occurred, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevalence did not differ significantly.
Conclusions: Same-day PrEP initiation is safe, feasible, and improves uptake and persistence. Adoption of this model may reduce barriers and accelerate HIV prevention.
Keywords: HIV prevention; PrEP.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: OG, HA, and VM declare no competing interests. KW reports grants from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN), Gilead Sciences, and ViiV Healthcare supporting HQ Health Hub community and research projects. KW also received payments for educational events, advisory boards, and attending CROI from Gilead and ViiV, unrelated to this work. TM reports OHTN grants for methamphetamine intervention and community projects at HQ Health Hub, and a ViiV Healthcare grant for “HIV Care Coordination.”
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
