Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of potentially zoonotic enterobacterales isolated from macaws in zoos of Northeastern Brazil
- PMID: 41193875
- PMCID: PMC12660590
- DOI: 10.1007/s42770-025-01799-3
Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of potentially zoonotic enterobacterales isolated from macaws in zoos of Northeastern Brazil
Abstract
This study aims to examine the frequency and antimicrobial sensitivity of Enterobacterales isolated from macaws in zoos in Northeastern Brazil. Using the following methodology, 97 cloacal swabs were collected from nine macaw species housed in eight zoological institutions across six states in Northeastern Brazil. Samples were collected using Stuart medium, pre-enriched in peptone water, and then enriched in Brain-Heart Infusion, Selenite Cystine, and Rappaport Vassiliadis broths. We then streaked them on MacConkey agar, Eosin Methylene Blue agar, Brilliant Green agar, and Salmonella-Shigella agar. Colonies exhibiting unique morphologies underwent bacterial tests for identification. Any samples suspected of containing Salmonella were sent to the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation for serotyping. We used the Kirby-Bauer test for the antimicrobial sensitivity test. A total of 123 strains belonging to the order Enterobacterales were isolated from 81 (83.5%) cloacal swab samples from macaws, with 16 bacterial species identified. The most frequently observed species were Escherichia coli (64.0%), Citrobacter freundii (15.5%), and Serratia liquefaciens (14.4%). The antibiotics showing the highest resistance were fosfomycin (16.3%), followed by tetracycline (13.9%), and amoxicillin with clavulanate (12.2%). However, the strains demonstrated substantial sensitivity to meropenem (100.0%), tobramycin (98.4%), and chloramphenicol (97.7%). We observed multi-resistance in 9 (7.3%) of the isolates, with E. coli 5/9 (55.5%) proving to be the most prevalent among the multi-resistant strains. These findings indicate that macaws in Northeastern Brazilian zoos may harbor antimicrobial-resistant, potentially zoonotic enterobacteria, underscoring the need for captive wildlife monitoring. The findings have implications for animal, human, and environmental health, reinforcing the importance of One Health strategies.
Keywords: Enterobacteria; Multidrug resistance; One health; Psittacines.
© 2025. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The autors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Lees AC, Haskell L, Allinson T, Bezeng SB, Burfield IJ, Renjifo LM, Rosenberg KV, Viswanathan A, Butchart SHM (2022) State of the world’s birds. Annu Rev Environ Resour 47(1):231–260. 10.1146/annurev-environ-112420-01464
-
- BirdLife International (2024) Country profile: Brazil. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/country/brazil on 06/11/2024
-
- Pacheco JF, Silveira LF, Aleixo A, Agne CE, Bencke GA, Bravo GA, Brito GRR, Cohn-Haft M, Maurício GN, Naka LN, Olmos F, Posso SR, Less AC, Figueiredo LFA, Carrano E, Guedes RC, Cesari E, Franz I, Schunck F, Piacentini VQ (2021) Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian ornithological records committee—second edition. Ornithol Res 29(2):94–105. 10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x
-
- Gill F, Donsker D, Rasmussen P (2024) IOC world bird list (v14.2). 10.14344/IOC.ML.14.1
-
- IUCN (2024) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2024-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 28 octubre 2024
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
