Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 7:e70131.
doi: 10.1111/tid.70131. Online ahead of print.

Donors Infectious Risk Stratification: Activity of the Italian National Transplant Center

Elena Graziano  1 , Maddalena Peghin  1 , Maria Luisa Balsamo  1 , Filippo Givone  1 , Maria De Martino  2 , Antonino Montemurro  3 , Francesca Puoti  3 , Massimo Cardillo  4 , Giuseppe Feltrin  3 , Letizia Lombardini  3 , Miriam Isola  2 , Paolo Antonio Grossi  1
Affiliations

Donors Infectious Risk Stratification: Activity of the Italian National Transplant Center

Elena Graziano et al. Transpl Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The use of organs from donors at increased infectious risk represents an effort to broaden the donor pool, but case-by-case evaluation may be needed. The Italian National Transplant Center (CNT) is supported by a second opinion task force of experts consulted for donors with complicated infectious assessment.

Methods: Retrospective observational study to describe infectious disease second opinion (IDSO) activity between June 2022 and October 2023. We analyzed the distribution of the infectious risk level, assigned according to the CNT protocol in five categories.

Results: IDSO evaluation was requested for 1246 of the 4153 (30%) of the donors. The mean age was 58.2 years, 56.8% were male, and most of them were Italians (91%). Donors had on average 1.5 (SD 0.9, range 1-6) infectious problems, the most frequent being pneumonia (453, 36.4%), inflammatory marker elevation (299, 24%), and bacteremia (125, 10%). The infectious risk was classified in most cases as increased but acceptable risk (60.8%), followed by negligible risk (19.2%) and increased but acceptable risk only for critical recipients (12.4%). Only 5.2% of donors were unacceptable, the main reason being inappropriately treated multidrug-resistant organism bacteremia or candidemia (21/65, 32.3%). Lung was the most frequently excluded organ (18.2%). In 284 donors (24%), additional testing was recommended, and in 299 recipients (25.3%), a specific therapeutic indication was given.

Conclusions: IDSO activity allowed the acceptance of the donor pool in almost 95% of the reviewed cases. Prospective international studies are necessary to understand the real impact of donors at increased infectious risk on recipient outcomes.

Keywords: consultation; donation; donor‐derived infections; transplant infectious disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. C. Petrini, “Organ Transplantation From Marginal and Non‐Standard Risk Donors: Ethical Requisites for Consent From Recipients,” Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità 53, no. 4 (2017): 350–353.
    1. E. Benamu, C. R. Wolfe, and J. G. Montoya, “Donor‐Derived Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Patients: Toward a Holistic Approach,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 30, no. 4 (2017): 329–339, https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000377.
    1. Council of Europe, Guide to the Quality and Safety of Organs for Transplantation (European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare [EDQM], 2022).
    1. M. Peghin, E. Graziano, and P. A. Grossi, “Interpreting and Managing Preservation Fluids Positive for Gram‐Negative Bacteria,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 37 (2024): 589–593, https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000001058.
    1. M. Peghin and P. A. Grossi, “Donor‐Derived Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 28, no. 5 (2023): 384–390, https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001094.

LinkOut - more resources