Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 6:S2214-109X(25)00415-2.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00415-2. Online ahead of print.

Effectiveness of the RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine in a real-world setting over 1 year of follow-up after the three-dose primary schedule: an interim analysis of a phase 4 study in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Effectiveness of the RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine in a real-world setting over 1 year of follow-up after the three-dose primary schedule: an interim analysis of a phase 4 study in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi

Latif Ndeketa et al. Lancet Glob Health. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: RTS,S/AS01E was first introduced within the Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme in selected areas in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. A series of post-introduction observational studies were initiated in these areas to assess RTS,S/AS01E safety and effectiveness in real-world settings. Here, we report the results of the interim analysis of the EPI-MAL-003 study secondary objectives related to vaccine effectiveness.

Methods: EPI-MAL-003 was a phase 4, disease surveillance study with prospective cohort event monitoring. The study was performed in routine medical practice settings at 12 sites (four per country) in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. Children younger than 18 months were enrolled in exposed clusters (sites where RTS,S/AS01E was introduced) and unexposed clusters; data were collected via active surveillance. In an interim analysis, we estimated the effect of vaccination on the incidence of malaria, all-cause hospitalisations, and malaria-related hospitalisations, the prevalence of anaemia among hospitalised children, and mortality over 1 year of follow-up after primary vaccination with three RTS,S/AS01E doses. These endpoints were analysed in the effectiveness analysis set. The primary endpoints are reported elsewhere, together with secondary safety endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03855995, and is completed.

Findings: The first child was enrolled on March 21, 2019, and the cutoff date for the current analysis was Nov 2, 2023. 45 000 children were enrolled (22 426 [49·8%] were female and 22 574 [50·25%] were male). 39 463 children were included in the analyses. When comparing vaccinated children from exposed clusters with unvaccinated children from unexposed clusters, country-adjusted incidence rate ratios were 0·70 (95% CI 0·67-0·73; p<0·001) for any malaria, 0·42 (0·30-0·60; p<0·001) for severe malaria, 0·64 (0·56-0·72; p<0·001) for malaria-related hospitalisations, 0·79 (0·74-0·84; p<0·001) for all-cause hospitalisations, and 0·83 (0·64-1·09; p=0·18) for all-cause mortality. The adjusted odds ratio for the prevalence of anaemia among children who were hospitalised (vaccinated children from exposed clusters vs unvaccinated children from unexposed clusters) was 0·81 (95% CI 0·73-0·90; p<0·001). Similar trends were observed in a before-after comparison with unvaccinated children enrolled in the EPI-MAL-002 study conducted before the RTS,S/AS01E introduction.

Interpretation: Over 1 year of follow-up after the third vaccine dose, vaccination with RTS,S/AS01E in real-world settings showed significant reductions in malaria burden. These findings reinforce the continued use of RTS,S/AS01E vaccination in children as an effective public health measure to reduce malaria-related illness and mortality in endemic regions, and highlight its relevance for future malaria control strategies.

Funding: GSK.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests VH, MD, RD, YGM, CC, FR, and MS are GSK employees. LS was a GSK employee and MOr was a contractor for GSK when the study was designed, initiated, or conducted. VH, MD, YGM, CC, FR, and MS also hold financial equities in GSK. NF reports funding to his institution from GSK in the form of a contract. KM reports funding to his institution through a Clinical Trial Agreement from GSK for the conduct of the study. All other authors have no financial relationships to disclose. We declare no other non-financial relationships and activities or competing interests.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources