Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 8;17(10):e94115.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.94115. eCollection 2025 Oct.

Peoria Posterior Fossa Stroke Scale: A New Scale to Assess the Severity of Posterior Fossa Stroke Symptoms and Outcomes

Affiliations

Peoria Posterior Fossa Stroke Scale: A New Scale to Assess the Severity of Posterior Fossa Stroke Symptoms and Outcomes

Lisle W Blackbourn et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction: Posterior fossa strokes often present with symptoms that are less obvious and can overlap with other conditions. While the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) remains a valuable tool for stroke assessment, its limitations in posterior fossa strokes necessitate a complementary approach. A posterior fossa stroke scale developed with standard protocols for use in various settings, such as pre-hospital, emergency department, and inpatient care, could ensure early identification and timely treatment. For this reason, the Peoria Posterior Fossa Stroke Scale (PPFSS) was created with the objective of creating an add-on to the NIHSS to allow for the assessment of the possibility of a posterior fossa stroke by any healthcare provider.

Materials and methods: A literature review of peer-reviewed publications via PubMed was conducted to identify clinical signs and symptoms associated with posterior fossa strokes and existing posterior fossa stroke scales. A preliminary scale draft was created and formatted for easy bedside application, which was then discussed with a panel of five vascular fellowship-trained neurologists and later a neuro-ophthalmologist to create a finalized scale. Proposed scale: The PPFSS consists of a six-section scoring system with a range of scores of zero to 15 and includes sections that include eyes, nystagmus, head impulse, hearing, pharynx, and balance that would be used in the acute setting of those suspected to have posterior fossa strokes. Limitations and future directions: Further research into the PPFSS would need to be done to validate its use. This would include testing in real-world settings to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PPFSS in identifying posterior circulation strokes, inter-rater reliability as measured by Cohen's kappa, and comparison to other scoring systems. Cognitive dysfunction of the patient and interrater reliability may factor into the scoring of the PPFSS.

Conclusion: A standardized, easy-to-use approach for assessing posterior fossa strokes could ensure consistency in diagnosis and treatment across healthcare settings. The PPFSS was developed as a potentially usable scale at bedside in the acute stroke setting that is ready for a validation research study.

Keywords: national institutes of health stroke scale; nihss; peoria posterior fossa stroke scale; posterior circulation stroke; posterior fossa stroke; stroke; stroke scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References

    1. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870. - PubMed
    1. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke in the emergency setting. Hoyer C, Szabo K. Front Neurol. 2021;12:682827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The pitfalls of NIHSS: time for a new clinical acute stroke severity scoring system in the emergency? Makharia A, Agarwal A, Garg D, Vishnu VY, Srivastava MV. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024;27:15–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health stroke scale score and vessel occlusion in 2152 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Heldner MR, Zubler C, Mattle HP, et al. Stroke. 2013;44:1153–1157. - PubMed
    1. Zero on the NIHSS does not equal the absence of stroke. Martin-Schild S, Albright KC, Tanksley J, Pandav V, Jones EB, Grotta JC, Savitz SI. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:42–45. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources