Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Nov 10;24(1):391.
doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05628-8.

Performance assessment of Bayesian meta-analytic predictive model on kdr mutation in insecticide-resistant malarial vectors in sub-Saharan Africa

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Performance assessment of Bayesian meta-analytic predictive model on kdr mutation in insecticide-resistant malarial vectors in sub-Saharan Africa

Eze Frank Ahuekwe et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Mosquito populations' selective pressure arising from the widespread and prolonged use of insecticides, especially pyrethroids, for both agricultural usages and public health outcomes, has immensely contributed to the emergence and heavily spread of insecticide resistance. In this study, a systematic review identified eight eligible case-control or cohort studies published between 2015 and 2025 across sub-Saharan Africa that reported both allele and/or genotype frequencies of L1014F and L1014S. The predictive performance and inferential robustness of a Bayesian meta-analytic model were applied and evaluated on two knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations, L1014F and L1014S, in the Anopheles mosquito populations. Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to compute pooled concordance statistics, odds ratios, and perform funnel plot asymmetry tests (Egger, Macaskill, Debray). The results revealed that L1014F showed a stronger and more consistent association with phenotypic resistance compared to L1014S, with odds ratios (OR) as high as 4.44 (95% CI 3.40-5.80). However, concordance statistics for both mutations demonstrated wide confidence intervals (L1014F: 0.141; CI - 0.095 to 0.459; L1014S: 0.169; CI - 0.399 to 0.688), indicating moderate predictive reliability. The Bayesian framework effectively synthesized complex and heterogeneous resistance data, confirming the operational relevance of KDR mutations in resistance surveillance. The global significance of these results enhances the predictive analytics in resistance management, such that resistance evolution is temporally and spatially dynamic. The integration of Bayesian modelling into existing entomological surveillance systems shifts the paradigm towards more adaptive and anticipatory management. Although data sparsity and regional heterogeneity warrant cautious interpretation, integrating ecological and thermodynamic variables into predictive models is essential for enhancing future resistance forecasting.

Keywords: Bayesian modelling; L1014F; L1014S; Predictive performance; Pyrethroid resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Consent to publish: Not applicable. This study does not involve any individual person’s data in any form (including individual details, images, or videos), and thus does not require consent to publish. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of PRISMA flow for Bayesian Analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plots of genotype–phenotype associations for kdr mutations: (a) L1014F and (b) L1014S. Each square represents the study-specific effect size (odds ratio on a log scale), with horizontal lines indicating 95% credible intervals. The diamond represents the pooled effect from the Bayesian random-effects model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
shows the funnel plot asymmetry tests using Egger’s regression method. Subplots (a) and (b) show Egger’s unweighted regression for L1014F and L1014S, respectively, while (c) and (d) show Egger’s regression with multiplicative overdispersion for L1014F and L1014S. Each plot displays study effect sizes against standard errors, with the regression line indicating the presence or absence of small-study effects

References

    1. Adegbite G, Edeki S, Isewon I, Dokunmu T, Rotimi S, Oyelade J, et al. Investigating the epidemiological factors responsible for malaria transmission dynamics. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2022;993:012008. 10.1088/1755-1315/993/1/012008. - DOI
    1. Oladipo HJ, Tajudeen YA, Oladunjoye IO, Yusuff SI, Yusuf RO, Oluwaseyi EM, et al. Increasing challenges of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa: priorities for public health research and policymakers. Ann Med Surg. 2022;81:104366. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2024. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.
    1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
    1. Ibrahim EA, Wamalwa M, Odindi J, Tonnang HE. Insights and challenges of insecticide resistance modelling in malaria vectors: a review. Parasit Vectors. 2024;17:174. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources