Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2026 Jan 1;161(1):50-57.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4941.

International Reference Values for Surgical Outcomes of Total Pancreatectomy

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

International Reference Values for Surgical Outcomes of Total Pancreatectomy

Philip C Müller et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Total pancreatectomy (TP) is indicated for advanced pancreatic cancer or multifocal tumors. Furthermore, TP may be performed to avoid the risk of pancreatic fistula in selected patients to improve the perioperative risk profile.

Objective: To define reference values for TP based on a low-risk cohort treated at expert centers.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter study analyzed outcomes from patients undergoing primary TP for malignant or benign lesions from 25 international expert centers from January 2017 to November 2023. Low-risk patients undergoing TP (LR-TP) were without vascular resections or significant comorbidities.

Exposures: TP.

Main outcomes and measures: Twenty reference values were derived from the 75th or the 25th percentile of the median values of all centers. Outcomes of LR-TP were compared with a cohort of TP with vascular resection, TP due to high-risk pancreatic anastomosis, and the benchmark values for low-risk pancreatoduodenectomy.

Results: Of 994 patients, 333 (33.5%; median [IQR] age, 66 [58-72] years; 171 male [51.4%]) qualified as the LR-TP cohort. Reference values included blood loss (≤1000 mL), major complications (≤37%), 3-month postoperative mortality (<6%), and retrieved lymph nodes (≥29). Compared with TP with vascular resections, reference cutoffs were not met for major complications (51% vs LR-TP ≤37%) and 90-day mortality (11% vs LR-TP ≤6%). For TP due to high-risk anastomosis, failure to rescue rate (38% vs ≤6%) and 90-day mortality (11% vs LR-TP ≤6%) were not met. Compared with pancreatoduodenectomy, reference values for postoperative mortality were 3 times higher for LR-TP (≤2% vs ≤6%) and less for resected lymph nodes (≥16 vs ≥29).

Conclusions and relevance: This case-control study provided global reference values for TP, indicating significantly higher postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with pancreatoduodenectomy. Perioperative morbidity of TP was especially increased in patients with vascular resections. These reference values can serve for quality control of pancreatic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Comment on

References

    1. Marchegiani G, Perri G, Burelli A, et al. High-risk pancreatic anastomosis vs total pancreatectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: postoperative outcomes and quality of life analysis. Ann Surg. 2022;276(6):e905-e913. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004840 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stoop TF, Bergquist E, Theijse RT, et al. ; Collaborators . Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of total pancreatectomy as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy in patients at high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula: is it a justifiable indication? Ann Surg. 2023;278(4):e702-e711. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005895 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ukegjini K, Müller PC, Warschkow R, et al. Partial pancreatoduodenectomy vs total pancreatectomy in patients with preoperative diabetes mellitus: comparison of surgical outcomes and quality of life. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;409(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03444-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loos M, Al-Saeedi M, Hinz U, et al. Categorization of differing types of total pancreatectomy. JAMA Surg. 2022;157(2):120-128. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5834 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gero D, Muller X, Staiger RD, et al. How to establish benchmarks for surgical outcomes: a checklist based on an international expert Delphi consensus. Ann Surg. 2022;275(1):115-120. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003931 - DOI - PubMed