Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 12;26(1):493.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09256-0.

Protocol for a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial to evaluate patient and researcher co-presentation of research results: the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network-Patients Alongside Investigators in Research-Sharing (SPIN-PAIRS) trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

Protocol for a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial to evaluate patient and researcher co-presentation of research results: the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network-Patients Alongside Investigators in Research-Sharing (SPIN-PAIRS) trial

Elsa-Lynn Nassar et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Researchers are mandated ethically to share study results with participants, and funding agencies emphasize dissemination to others with relevant lived experience. Many researchers, however, find it difficult to communicate study purposes, methods, results, and significance to patients. Our Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) piloted "co-presentation," which involves researchers and patient partners jointly presenting results to other patients. The SPIN Patients Alongside Investigators in Research-Sharing (SPIN-PAIRS) Trial will be conducted as part of a 90-min virtual research event for people with systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma) and will compare patient and researcher partner co-presentation versus researcher-alone presentation. Primary outcomes will be event attendee ratings of presentations on (1) information completeness, (2) understandability, (3) relevance to patients, and (4) trust in findings. Secondary objectives are to (1) conduct subgroup analyses of primary outcomes by participant characteristics (gender, age, race or ethnicity, country, education level, health literacy) and (2) use qualitative interviews to better understand outcome ratings and inform co-presentation.

Methods: This will be a mixed-method study with (1) a two-arm parallel superiority randomized controlled trial embedded in a patient-oriented research event and (2) interviews with patient and researcher co-presenters, separately, and with trial participants. Pre-event, researchers will be selected to present via an open call for abstracts and a patient-led selection committee. To avoid presentation-related biases, pre-event, researchers will record researcher-alone presentations. They will then receive co-presentation training and develop co-presentations with patient partners, which will also be recorded. Eligible trial participants will be adults aged 18 or older who indicate they have been diagnosed with SSc by a physician. We will recruit participants via social media and email lists from our multinational SPIN Cohort and from patient organization partners to attend the event and rate presentations. Participants will be recruited to register for the event beginning in August 2025. Registered participants will be invited to confirm their registration and enroll in the trial on the day of the event. We will require at least 116 participants for ≥ 80% power but will not restrict the number of enrollees. We will randomly assign event attendees 1:1 to virtual rooms with (1) four pre-recorded patient-researcher co-presentations or (2) four pre-recorded researcher-alone presentations. The same studies will be presented in each arm with live questions and answers after each presentation in each virtual room. Attendees will rate each presentation immediately following the presentation. Participants will not be informed that they are part of a randomized trial, or that two conditions are being compared and will be blind to study comparisons and hypotheses. Presenters will not be blinded during the event. We will compare outcomes, all measured via 0-10 numerical rating scales, using linear mixed models with four observations per participant for each outcome (one observation for each presentation). Interviews will be conducted < 2 weeks post-event, and verbatim transcripts will be analyzed using an inductive-deductive thematic approach.

Discussion: Findings will contribute to the evidence base on effective strategies for sharing results with study participants and others with relevant lived experience. Trial registration ISRCTN12805381 ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12805381 ).

Keywords: Co-presentation; Knowledge translation; Patient and public involvement; Patient engagement; Patient-oriented research; Randomized controlled trial; Research dissemination; Scleroderma; Systemic sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (no. 2025-4165). All participants will provide electronic consent via Qualtrics prior to participating in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Planned flow of participants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Planned schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments

References

    1. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. JAMA. 2025;333(1):71–4. 10.1001/jama.2024.21972. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Government of Canada. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans – TCPS 2 2022. Available from: https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2022.html. [cited 2025 Jul 29].
    1. Health Research Authority. UK policy framework for health and social care research. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standard.... [cited 2025 Jul 29].
    1. National Institutes of Health. A checklist for communicating science and health research to the public. Available from: https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/science-health-public-trust/che.... [cited 2025 Jul 29].
    1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants & funding. NIH policy on the dissemination of NIH-funded clinical trial information. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/clinical-tria.... [cited 2025 Jul 29].

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources