Consumer Perceptions of Botanical Sources of Nutrients: A UK-Based Visual Focus Group Study Exploring Perceptions of Nettles (Urtica dioica) as a Sustainable Food Source
- PMID: 41227673
- PMCID: PMC12610542
- DOI: 10.3390/foods14213702
Consumer Perceptions of Botanical Sources of Nutrients: A UK-Based Visual Focus Group Study Exploring Perceptions of Nettles (Urtica dioica) as a Sustainable Food Source
Abstract
Increasingly, attention is being paid to the underutilised wild edible nettle plant (Urtica dioica) as a healthy and sustainable food source. However, little is known about UK consumers' acceptance of nettles and supplements containing nettles. This study explored UK consumers' perceptions of nettles as a food source and nettle-based powder supplements, using visual focus group methodology (i.e., creative drawing tasks and group discussion). A total of n = 34 participated in the study, with each participant engaging in one of five visual focus groups. Barriers to consumption and how consumers envisaged using nettle-based supplements were also explored. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse group discussions and pictures were analysed using visual content analysis drawing on the principles of content analysis, semiotics, and iconography. Findings revealed limited awareness amongst consumers about nettles as a food source, with sensory properties and prior experiences negatively affecting perceptions of nettle consumption. Concerns over processing and the inclusion of carrier ingredients reduced consumer trust in a nettle powder supplement viewing these as 'ultra-processed' and unhealthy. A preference for natural additional ingredients was revealed, potentially signalling an opportunity to engage and educate consumers around sustainable eating. Transparency in labelling information may improve consumer confidence and trust in nettle powder supplements.
Keywords: UK consumers; botanical; nettles; perceptions; plant-based; sustainable food consumption; visual focus group.
Conflict of interest statement
The funding for this research is part of a scheme which promotes academic and industry collaboration. The project was led by Cleobury and funded by Innovate UK Diet and Health Innovation Early Stage feasibility. Cleobury and Phytoquest Ltd. were industry collaborators. AJL and AWW listed as authors, are the owners and producers of spray-dried powders at Cleobury and may stand to benefit from the results of this study. RJN is affiliated with Phytoquest Ltd., one of the industry partners in the project. Twisted Orange and LW run a joint endeavour with Kaleidoscope. The authors declare that there are no other competing financial interests. Innovate UK had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Vermeulen S.J., Campbell B.M., Ingram J.S.I. Climate Change and Food Systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012;37:195–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020411-130608. - DOI
-
- Mensah K., Wieck C., Rudloff B. Sustainable Food Consumption and Sustainable Development Goal 12: Conceptual Challenges for Monitoring and Implementation. Sustain. Dev. 2024;32:1109–1119. doi: 10.1002/sd.2718. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
