Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 13;40(1):231.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-05011-8.

International expert Delphi consensus on management of early and locally advanced rectal cancer

Collaborators, Affiliations

International expert Delphi consensus on management of early and locally advanced rectal cancer

Cihad Tatar et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. .

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment strategies for early and locally advanced rectal cancer are evolving, particularly with the increasing use of non-operative management and multidisciplinary decision-making. The aim of this study is to establish an expert-based consensus on the preferred treatment strategies for early and locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods: A 12-member steering committee was established to conduct a modified Delphi consensus process on rectal cancer management. The committee performed a systematic literature review (2014-2024) to inform survey development. A 49-question survey, including open-ended and multiple-choice items, was developed and refined. A panel of 44 colorectal surgery experts was selected based on academic contributions, and two Delphi rounds were conducted anonymously. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Based on panel responses, 29 consensus statements were formulated.

Results: The panel reached consensus on the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation and surgical expertise in total mesorectal excision. Structured MRI reporting was recommended. Total neoadjuvant therapy was preferred for high-risk tumors. Non-operative management was recommended in cases of clinical complete response, with defined surveillance strategies. The role of biopsy in near-complete responders was also addressed.

Conclusions: This international consensus provides structured guidance on the management of rectal cancer, emphasizing multidisciplinary planning, the role of total neoadjuvant therapy in organ preservation, and rigorous surveillance protocols in non-operative management. These recommendations aim to standardize care and support evidence-informed clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Clinical complete response; Consensus; Multidisciplinary team; Non-operative management; Rectal cancer; Total neoadjuvant therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Methodology of the study

References

    1. Azevedo JM, Vailati BB, Julião GPS et al (2019) Current surgical strategies in the management of rectal cancer. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 15:18–27
    1. Stornes T, Wibe A, Nesbakken A et al (2016) National early rectal cancer treatment revisited. Dis Colon Rectum 59:623–629 - PubMed
    1. Rouleau-Fournier F, Brown CJ (2019) Can less be more? Organ preservation strategies in the management of rectal cancer. Curr Oncol 26:S16–S23 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Althumairi AA, Gearhart SL (2015) Local excision for early rectal cancer: transanal endoscopic microsurgery and beyond. J Gastrointest Oncol 6:296–306 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halverson AL, Morris AM, Cleary RK, et al (2019) For patients with early rectal cancer, does local excision have an impact on recurrence, survival, and quality of life relative to radical resection? Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:2497–2506. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources