Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 14;17(1):142.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-025-01568-9.

Development of a consensus molecular classifier for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Affiliations

Development of a consensus molecular classifier for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pablo Villoslada-Blanco et al. Genome Med. .

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a significant challenge, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Tumor heterogeneity contributes to the limited effectiveness of treatments. Several tumor and stroma molecular classifiers have attempted to clarify this heterogeneity with moderate agreement. Recognizing the complexity introduced by this extensive array of taxonomies, this study aims to develop a consensus molecular classifier by including both tumor and stroma features.

Methods: We analyzed mRNA expression data from 514 PDAC samples, applying batch correction, filtering out low-expression genes, and using variance-stabilizing transformation. Tumor and stroma profiles were classified with previously published systems, while stroma compartments were estimated through virtual microdissection. For each classifier, multiple machine learning models were trained and optimized, with the top performers used to assign subtypes. A consensus classifier was created by building subtype similarity networks and applying a Markov clustering algorithm, and robustness was evaluated through resampling. Associations between consensus classes and overall survival were examined using multivariate Cox models.

Results: The results indicated that Elastic-Net emerged as the superior model. We identified two classes for tumor components (Consensus Classical and Consensus Non-classical) and stroma components (Consensus Normal-Immune and Consensus Activated-ECM). The consensus Random Forest achieved a balanced accuracy of 96.33 and 98.92%, respectively. Across cohorts, the PDAConsensus algorithm identified tumor subtypes with distinct prognostic value, with Consensus Non-classical tumors showing poorer survival than Consensus Classical tumors. Associations for stroma consensus classes were weaker and less consistent across datasets.

Conclusions: We developed a robust consensus classifier for PDAC that integrates tumor and stroma features. The classifier is accessible through the R package PDACMOC (PDACMolecularOmniClassifier, https://github.com/pavillos/PDACMOC , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17161373 ) and a Shiny app ( https://pdacmoc.cnio.es/ ). This classifier offers a biologically grounded framework that integrates existing systems, allows for single-sample classification, and improves prognostic stratification. By enabling subtype-specific therapies and better patient stratification in clinical trials, it can help guide precision medicine and enhance outcomes in PDAC management.

Keywords: Consensus molecular classifier; Machine Learning; PDAC; Personalized medicine; Transcriptomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Circus plots display the distribution of subtypes across various classification systems. ADEX (aberrantly differentiated endocrine-exocrine), QM (quasi-mesenchymal)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consensus classes are derived from applying the Markov Clustering Algorithm over the network of Cohen’s kappa indices between the subtypes of each classification
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Parallel sets illustrate how samples classified as Consensus Classical or Consensus Non-classical and as Consensus Normal-immune or Consensus Activated-ECM are categorized by other classifiers
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation between NonClassicalScore and ActivatedECMScore
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Cox Proportional Hazards models of tumor and stroma classifiers in the validation datasets. ADEX (aberrantly differentiated endocrine-exocrine), ECM (extracellular matrix), ICGC (International Cancer Genome Consortium), QM (quasi-mesenchymal

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36633525/. Cited 2023 Nov 14. - PubMed
    1. Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, Shroff RT. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10242):2008–20. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32593337/. Cited 2023 Dec 20. - PubMed
    1. Bailey P, Chang DK, Nones K, Johns AL, Patch AM, Gingras MC, et al. Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2016;531(7592):47–52. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26909576/. Cited 2023 Nov 14. - PubMed
    1. Hoadley KA, Yau C, Hinoue T, Wolf DM, Lazar AJ, Drill E, et al. Cell-of-origin patterns dominate the molecular classification of 10,000 tumors from 33 types of cancer. Cell. 2018;173(2):291–304.e6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29625048/. Cited 2023 Nov 14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erkan M, Hausmann S, Michalski CW, Fingerle AA, Dobritz M, Kleeff J, et al. The role of stroma in pancreatic cancer: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(8):454–67. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22710569/. Cited 2023 Oct 14. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources