Interventions to prevent postoperative neurocognitive complications: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
- PMID: 41243663
- DOI: 10.1111/anae.70061
Interventions to prevent postoperative neurocognitive complications: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
Abstract
Introduction: The certainty of the effectiveness of interventions to manage postoperative neurocognitive complications remains unclear. The objective of this umbrella review was to synthesise and evaluate the evidence for interventions aimed at reducing the incidence of peri-operative neurocognitive complications.
Methods: We searched relevant databases from inception to 23 August 2025. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised trials evaluating pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of postoperative neurocognitive complications in adult surgical populations. Certainty of evidence for each intervention was assessed using the GRADE framework. Methodological quality was appraised using AMSTAR and the Ioannidis classification.
Results: A total of 114 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, with data from 250,777 patients, were included. Dexmedetomidine, cerebral monitoring, acupuncture, sleep interventions, steroids, antipsychotics, peripheral nerve blocks, esketamine and remimazolam were associated with reductions in postoperative neurocognitive complications. Subgroup analyses indicated that these interventions also showed potential benefits across non-cardiac, orthopaedic and cardiac surgery. However, the overall certainty of evidence for all these interventions was predominantly very low.
Discussion: A number of peri-operative interventions are associated with a reduction in postoperative neurocognitive complications but the certainty of evidence supporting these interventions to prevent is very low. High-quality research is needed to advance the evidence base and inform future clinical practice.
Keywords: anaesthesia; delirium; peri‐operative; postoperative cognitive decline; umbrella review.
Plain language summary
It is not yet clear how well different treatments work to stop thinking and memory problems after surgery. This review looked at all the best research to find out what helps. We searched several research databases. We included reviews that studied medicines and other treatments used to help adults after surgery. We checked how strong the evidence was using standard tools. We found 114 reviews with information from about 250,000 people. Some treatments, such as dexmedetomidine, brain monitoring, acupuncture, better sleep, steroids, antipsychotic medicines, nerve blocks, esketamine and remimazolam, seemed to help reduce thinking and memory problems after surgery. These treatments showed possible benefits for people having different kinds of surgery, like heart or bone operations. However, the overall evidence for these treatments was weak, so we can't be sure they really work. More high‐quality studies are needed to know which treatments truly help and to guide doctors in the future.
© 2025 The Author(s). Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.
References
-
- Tasbihgou SR, Absalom AR. Postoperative neurocognitive disorders. Korean J Anesthesiol 2021; 74: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.20294.
-
- Whitlock EL, Vannucci A, Avidan MS. Postoperative delirium. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 448–456.
-
- Rundshagen I. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 119–125. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0119.
-
- Sadeghirad B, Dodsworth BT, Schmutz Gelsomino N, et al. Perioperative factors associated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: an individual patient data meta‐analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6: e2337239. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37239.
-
- Arefayne NR, Berhe YW, van Zundert AA. Incidence and factors related to prolonged postoperative cognitive decline (POCD) in elderly patients following surgery and anaesthesia: a systematic review. J Multidiscip Healthc 2023; 16: 3405–3413. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S431168.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
